Thank you for your contribution!
Keeping that "Just buy a shitload of cheap-o eBay 2U/4U hand-me-downs" workflow viable for years to come :D
104 karma · joined August 3, 2018
Keeping that "Just buy a shitload of cheap-o eBay 2U/4U hand-me-downs" workflow viable for years to come :D
iLO is kind of a piece of crap, but I do love my Xen and resource pools
Your level of detachment feels extreme to them and upsets them and thus they've deemed it a gimmick/act.
I usually have comparable or better options available at any given time due to the sheer number of recruiters who are constantly floating things my way.
An up-to-date, relevant skillset is worth a potential 5 figure pay bump in the near future, which tends to be much more lucrative than slightly increased job security at my current pay rate.
They usually get one screw-up before I skip out for a better paying gig.
Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me.
Have more than tripled my salary in the last 6 years hopping around like this.
But honestly, I'm also just not a fan of management styles which attempt to extract additional value via appeals to fear.
Usually if I see workplace management react to crunch time by letting shit roll downhill while making negative implications about how resistance might impact job security, that instantly puts me in job hunting mode.
I might stick around for a bit to help out people on my team that I actually like, but at that point I'm already mentally checked out and looking for my next gig.
It's a small world out there sometimes.
The well has already been poisoned.
Paranoia has now been compounded.
Clarity regarding contemporary domestic political landscape has now been further muddled.
Effective astroturfing was always a secondary objective.
I would argue that we should not be intentionally relying on technical design decisions to bust through difficulties which are more related to human factors and office politics than software architecture or implementation.
For instance, how is Prime 2-day shipping not considered part of the purchasing experience?
The Shift key became infinitely more useful once my ears acclimated to the setup change.
In many ways it's not so different than billiards/snooker/pool. Being a good shot-maker helps but just about all the consistently performing pros focus first and foremost on position-play and thinking several shots ahead.
['1', '7', '11'].map(Number)Seems like you'd only want to use parseInt if you expect to need radix changes at some point, e.g. converting between hex strings, decimal values, and binary strings
['1', '7', '11'].map(Math.round)
// => [1, 7, 11]
[["00000001", 2], ["00000111", 2], ["0x0B", 16]].map(x => parseInt(...x))
// => [1, 7, 11]They go for anywhere from a couple hundred to 1k+ (like the Stellas) apiece and you typically want 3 - 5 rod/reel setups when going on a fishing trip.
But being poor DOES mean lowered efficiency with respect to an astonishing number of steps involved to achieve the desired outcome.
And when you have enough of these lowered efficiencies at one time and they begin to compound like interest...
Not always a pretty picture.
Perhaps a contributing factor to the Peter Principle?
This is as someone who used to weigh around 255 and now weighs around 170.
The more fit you are, the more comfy fitted/tailored apparel tends to be.
If you are atypically shaped due to various fat deposits, tailored clothing becomes more difficult to get just right in order to not pinch/restrict you in all the wrong places.
The contrast is quite stark.
The rest is great!
Unfortunately not everyone cares about resilience and certain performance thresholds when it comes to construction, especially when budgets become involved.
Some customers will are happy to cheap out for a hack-job remodel in the hopes that they can flip their home and run off before the bagholder realizes they got a lemon.