But all we got is Linux on the desktop...
658 karma · joined August 8, 2018
But all we got is Linux on the desktop...
If you have experienced IRC, it's basically that. You have smaller rooms (groups) and bigger ones. Every room has their active 1%, their own rules and customs and after a while, their own inside jokes etc.
Otherwise, it's a bit like reddit because you join groups that are usually about a certain topic / niche (general programming, JavaScript, Counter Strike, cooking, what have you) and it's also a bit like twitter because there's often a "hot topic" for a day or two with small things happening in between. Also because no one in their right mind treats those chats like actual group chats, as in, you don't read all the messages you missed. After a weekend i have at least 10k "missed messages".
This comparison is also cool because it reminds you to treat telegram just like reddit and twitter: it's public basically. Anyone can join groups you're in and log every message (there's plenty bots that do that) and they can see the contents of a public group even without joining. It's not encrypted by default and frankly, barely anyone uses secret chats, if only because ppl are on their desktop half the time anyway
"We may also share personal information that does not identify you with third parties for their own marketing and advertising purposes, which you can opt out of. This mainly occurs when you interact with our websites and mobile applications that contain third-party cookies or other advertising trackers. To learn more about this, please read our Cookies Notice."
Coupled with: https://www.vice.com/en/article/gygx7y/your-anonymous-browsi...
b) Afaik there's data brokers that know this and collect data from many different kinds of sources (isps being only one of them) those then sell to people like private investigators and private intelligence companies. Sadly I don't have a source ready, I learned this on a podcast and completely forgot which one. But the vice article above goes into that direction too.
c) That's correct, but that's also already valuable on it's own. I assume the /pathnames/ can come from third party tracking / ad companies, but dns data alone is also valuable. It's all in the patters of the (meta)data
d) Very likely exciting to many. Voyeurism and the "forbidden apple" aren't exactly new concepts
Since most countries limit travel, it'll take longer to get around
These two I always remember. So that's maybe why
At least I cut the image so it's not obvious
There you have it
So for example I enter mycustomer.com and it tells me "avoid http redirects" because I didn't enter the https:// before.
Hsts is included in one of our packages which also includes CSP settings and other security stuff, but barely anyone buys that.
Usually when I enter a site to test it there, it always tells me to avoid redirects. I think HSTS would would have also solved this, but our (managed) hosting provider does not offer this as a default, and doing it manually for the amount of sites is not really practical. At least not the sites that are already done.
Most were payments of about 2€ in the same store next to work.
Whatever I dont use it anymore
But when your account is suspended that doesn't really help you eh
My suspicion is that this is mostly happening because platforms that big like google or twitter rely very heavily on machine learning and other AI related technology to ban people. Because honestly, the amount of spam and abuse that are likely happening on these platforms has to be mind boggling high.
So I get why they would try to automate bans.
But after years and years of regular high profile news of false positives, one would think they eventually would change something.
I mean the guy had direct business with Google going on....
Why would they continue like that. Isn't there one single PR person at Google?
How is CCTV that much different? Or people with cameras?