Monkey.org
monkey.org
monkey.org
I miss the old goons I grew up idolizing. Wonder where they are now - with their children and their CTO positions.
Don’t take community or friends for granted. Y’all Monkeys are luckier than you know.
My dad did get us dial-up internet in 1995, but he was a uni professor doing stuff with computers for a long while (we've had a Novell Netware network at home in 1993).
But basically nobody I knew was getting online too, and BBSes were still a thing for older beards.
Can we please come together and form a sort of tilde club on IPFS oder the Dat protocol? Like "The Well" for today, with intelligent, respectful conversations in a format that is not as toxic as 140 characters and no sane threading?
So that the protocol itself will filter away the eternal septemberists?
And can we please make it uncomfortable for the "I need total anonymity for my free speech conspiracy BS", so that we also keep these nutcracks away from our community?
I actually signed up for The Well a while ago, just to see what it was all about. Unfortunately it felt very stagnant, IMHO. I guess its heyday is over.
Paul Frazee who is from that team is also working on a social network built on the protocol called CTZN, live streaming his development on youtube. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=pfrazee
The name is already totally aligned with our core values. Very obscure and unattractive.
Have not seen the vids yet. Is it already usable? Anyone on there already?
A side note: The internet sure was a different place back then. Content was not made for ads like it is now! People posted stuff for everyone to share, and the best stuff rose to the top. I really miss the early internet before the ads came.
I’m no industry titan, but I have been around the block. Many came before me, but I have seen the modern Internet rise from almost nothing. We all have to start somewhere. I still use Reddit, guess I am too old for it, but I started when it was all about programming, and had just launched. I was a developer first, but also a sysadmin for a startup. Did that from 2000-2006, before we called it DevOps. Someone had to keep the servers up. I was huge into MUDs and coding/building them... I actually kept track of a couple of the people I played with over all these years, but only a couple.
YC, Paul Graham, and the entrepreneurial spirit is built into me now. I read every Pg essay when it came out. In my career I only worked at a larger company for a few years in my 22 year career in tech this far. Tech is weird some days.
Now get off my lawn and all you kids stop using NoSQL and JavaScript and quit writing electron apps ;)
I did some free work for someone. The logo was for "Digi(something)" ... is it one of you monkey's?
I used QuarXPress and Photoshop. One of the first software I used and installed on a 3.5 disk. At a young age this was exciting tech time for me.
BTW, I find this (mostly) American tendency to divvy up people into strict categories by their age very strange: boomers, gen. X/Y/Z, millennials etc., each with their own stereotypes. Which leads to even more alienation when people look at these (and other) stereotypes and think that they don't fit in because they don't recognize themselves in them. Of course they don't, because every person is unique!
I feel exactly the same way. My brother is ten years older than me, so I discovered the Internet at a very young age. It was like a science fiction western, filled to the brim with hackers and webmasters.
Once I grew up and became a developer, I never found a community like the ones I saw when I was a kid. To me, even open-source projects often look like corporate projects in comparison. There was a sense of excitement back then that no longer exists today - or at least, I can't seem to find it.
I am filled with nostalgia whenever I see retro art, like the first edition of Shadowrun books.
I definitely miss the "old web"....
I miss the forums I used to participate in during early 2000s. It was a profoundly human experience with good and bad moments. It's also the reason I speak english today. Found multiple communities dedicated to a video game series I liked. There were boards about everything, from the games themselves to fan creations and the almighty off-topic board. All kinds of people frequented these places. I remember I got to know many of them. Sometimes while I'm browsing reddit I recognize an old nickname from those days and I am tempted to send a PM.
Quake was released in 1996 and Half-Life was released in 1998.
Those seem very close to be stranded between them. I played the heck out of quake and I still haven't played Half-life to this day.
It was a very cool, crazy, fast, and weird time, I'll grant you that.
I loved that ethos. It just seemed like it was group after group of really talented teenagers with pirated copies of Photoshop putting together these elaborate projects and releases, sort of like the demo scene in Europe or the elite ANSI group artpacks from the BBS days.
I haven’t thought about it or them in forever, but Lockjaw was my favorite. Whenever they’d have a release, it may as well have been my favorite band releasing a new album. You could just see how quickly the modern aesthetics (and what people figured out they could do with JavaScript) were changing.
I worked part-time for a design studio back then (eventually bought by Razorfish, which should really date my story to a specific era!) and it was just so visibly obvious that the print designers weren’t going to be able to catch up. The new wave took over so fast, and it was all these cool punk kids who could design it and code it at the same time.
I hesitate to call it “better” because there was nothing even close to frameworks or version control or anything back then. But it was certainly more original.
They ended up specifying a percentage of your quota you could use for any sort of backup or personal storage to try settling the matter.
Apparently backups of any kind were not allowed by the TOS, but this was buried somewhere deep in the TOS, and once they made the decision to shut me down there was no recourse. I had something like a week to move everything away from dreamhost. I believe my account was targeted because I was using a large amount of disk space (for TOS legitimate purposes) and they wanted to find any reason to let me go.
After some spat with a forum troll on another site, he sent some kind of complaint to Dreamhost.
In retrospect, I suspect this was a DMCA notice, either way DreamHost never really explained to me why they shut down my account, but they did so _immediately_ without any notice, they wouldn't let me download any of my data.
It's an unfortunate reflection of the "mainstream web" that I feel compelled to remark on the use of simple HTML and CSS, only marred by a single Google Analytics script. There's not a lot of content here, but there's also not a lot of bloat either.
You find some really good in-depth content for niche areas on these sort of sites (personal HTML websites, neocities.org, etc.). But if you forget the URL, it's usually very hard to find them again on Google even with using specific keywords. Too much SEO spam clogging up the results. I suspect not having Google Analytics scripts on the pages may also contribute.
One that I can remember off the top of my head was a blog with a pink-ish background with content on making quills and ink from plants, among other stuff. One post specifically had an easy ink recipe that used walnuts iirc. Google will show you tons of big SEO'd Wordpress blogs with ads/affiliate links but not the old school genuine site.
Another one was the blog of a day trader (a real one, not a guy trying to sell day trading courses). Impossible to find. site:wordpress.com helps filter out some of the SEO spam but I think it must have been hosted on a custom domain. It definitely looked like a standard Wordpress website when I read it a long time ago.
Compared to the tens of millions of competing -useful- sites, they are markedly less deserving of a spot. In fact, it would be unfair to award one to them purely because they are "independent".
A bookstores a bad analogy. Maybe a fashion store.
If you're a heavy consumer of the net you probably hit the edges of your algorithmic fish bowl pretty regularly. I know I do and it's work to get out.
Actually, I'd so much like to see different things more often I'd consider turning ads back on if the service could be provided.
On the Amazon-CEO news yesterday, someone posted an interview of JB from 1997 [0]. In the first 2-3 minutes he explained exactly that (but for books). There are X million titles on books, they keep a tiny fraction of that in stock for 'next day delivery'. Kinda what Google does (or many search engines). Usually you find the 'most popular' answers on the first page. But when I have a tech problem, I have usually tried the 'first 5 pages' of solutions before I even try to duck it (DDG) for a solution (dear wikihow, yes I did restart my PC!).
I assume HN has the type of readers that already KNOW the first 10 pages of solutions, and thus need that tiny level of detail that one gets after digging deep (stackexchange, forums, etc.)
Question if anyone who knows: does Google search engine give preference to websites that display Google ads, or it is agnostic? I assume Google's crawlers can 'read' if a website is using X, Y, or Z advertiser's ads. (I haven't used Google for many many years and I usually block any google search and ads related IPs and URLs)(and ads in general).
[0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWRbTnE1PEM I suggest you spend the 5mins to watch this video. He made it sound so easy..
Officially, Google claims it does not [https://ads.google.com/home/resources/seo-vs-ppc].
The most accurate (sacrificing probability) answer is "Google's ranking algorithm is proprietary; nobody can independently verify whether they up-rank sites that display Google ads by looking at the source code." Attempts to figure that out from the outside via black-box testing are complicated by the simple ubiquity of Google ads; there's a lot of conflating signal that would have to be tuned out (even if one observes correlation between top search results and Google ads, one has to control for the probability that any random site has Google ads on it, or that ads pay for the SEO and information collection that tends to result in a site that ranks highly in Google results, or even the probability that a site without ads, having found itself high in the rankings because it's delivering data that Google concludes is valuable to users, wouldn't respond to that observation by putting Google ads on their site to capture money otherwise left on the table).
A randomizing carousel is a different tool, which Google is not. Nor, to my knowledge, is DDG or Bing... They show a different set of ten books, but the same optimizing goals apply for their use cases.
Is anyone doing something like a search engine that intentionally surfaces rarer data (i.e. makes the tradeoff intentionally of "less likely to satisfy your query, but seen by fewer people")? I'm not aware of one.
https://int10h.org/oldschool-pc-fonts/
not really relatated at all to my search, but I'm very glad to find it. A beutiful looking site indeed. This is the kind of stuff I remember doing back in the 90s, you'd search for something then something more random would show up but often be interesting to check out.
"OK, you've created your web site, registered it, then found that there are 341 other web sites in your search engine category. How do you distinguish your web site from all of the rest? How do you encourage visitors to remember and revisit your web site? Add a games area!"
Anecdotally, I clicked on the monkey.org link, poked around for thirty seconds, found
- an FAQ that didn't answer any questions I had
- a list of users (no particular reason to click on any, so I didn't)
- a list of domains (no particular reason to click on any, so I didn't)
... and no understanding of what "monkey.org" was or is. I've learned more reading the comments on this HN post than I did from the website.
This isn't to say monkey.org should change anything about what it's doing; it seems to be what it wants to be, and that's great. But a search engine isn't going to index that highly, because it generally answers nobody's questions about anything.
If I had to guess monkey.org was started around 1996, and I wouldn't be surprised if there was a BBS before it moved online ;)
https://duo.com/blog/post-author/dugsong
I think he has an account here on HN.
edit .. last post in 2009 https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=dugsong
Like, what's the actual joke here?
"monkey.org is happy to host sites for our users. but not you."
"monkey.org has a bunch of users. most of them hate you."
Okay?
I know and worked with several of the people on the users list. Great people, but I don't know why this is on the HN front page.
If any of you are looking to join Niels and me at Stripe, do please drop me a note.
monkey.org provides for its users domain registration services. monkey.org can also transfer domains from other registrars to our system.Marius also has great profile, I am happy user of his libraries (e.g, finagle)!
- Member of w00w00
- Major contributor to openssh and making it ubiquitous
- Pushed OpenBSD forward back in the day. These guys, back in the day they will drive from Ann Arbor to Windsor, Canada to write code to get around the US crypto export.
- Knows quite a bit about Kerberos
- Oh wait, Founder of Duo security.
If you want whatever this is to come back in spirit, stop lamenting at very turn and be more open, make friends, build stuff, or at the very least explain what's going on and share the magic, we're all interested in niche stuff here and who knows, maybe you'll get in touch with someone with the same brain frequency you're looking for.
Standing ovation. So good. A lifetime ago.
Putty is hosted here.
interesting!
So, thanks monkey.org :)
Edit: the parent comment was edited. It originally ended with:
> And has a lot of phishing stuff on it... https://monkey.org/~jose/phishing/
> Maybe this should be deleted?
I personally found the website intriguing as a proto-social network: it's a mysterious collection of people, whose photos and ramblings exude a certain sincerity, which I can't help but feel is violated by my mere stumbling on them!
(It appears most are Arbor Networks alum)
(I'm an Arbor alum, but not a Monkey).
L.O.L
If you have seen the movie (1995), you know what I mean.
Yes. This is only for monkey.org users.
IF YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT THAT MEANS, PLEASE GO AWAY.Basically just a website for friends
The user list isn't particularly long, so I suspect more the former than the latter.
And the quote above doesn't mention friends, just people who know people. The word "friend" is massively overused these days, thanks Facebook, but that doesn't seem relevant here.
Also several were significant openbsd/openssh contributors back in the day.
A more Ann Arbor story there is not!
I think Andy (dros) is a Linux filesystem contributor working at NetApp. Definitely interesting stuff from many of the monkey.org users all over the interwebs!
Why do I remember that and why does it sound familiar?
(And after writing the above, my next thought was "Jennie? Jennie Garth? Describe her." -- yes, I'm odd.)
--
EDIT: Oh, cool, it still exists [0] (And my questions are now answered!)
--