326 karma · joined June 24, 2019
My optiplex shows as 8.191 kwh last month -> 11w average.
You should instead be asking, what are the odds that that X voters could change their vote.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oAHbLRjF0vo
This is basically https://arxiv.org/abs/0802.0733 but differs to the paper in that it doesn't consider: alternating odd-and-even row disembarkment, which would give passengers more aisle space to potentially speed-up luggage handling.
For the non-Australians, we don't really say parmigiana either, it's parmi or parma and there's a lot of playful debate over the naming.
Aside from that, email addresses to usernames might be valuable - you could identify high-value targets from finance, crypto, or luxury item subs.
Or you could just make lists of people who post on specific subs for targeted harrassment.
Linux support is nice though.
Microtransactions, real money loot-boxes, gambling, NFT marketplace, battlepasses
doesn't milk it's users?
Dota used to have $35 "arcanas", a high quality skin for a single hero which were released intermittently - but that wasn't enough money, they're now placed $200+ deep in the yearly battlepass. If you played any of their games, you'd realise they're one of greediest in the business.
It's not worth reading however, because the author whimsically extrapolates energy usage starting from 230 years before the invention of the lightbulb to get their exponential growth argument which doesn't hold at all for modern data.
https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EG.USE.ELEC.KH.PC?end=2...
The more someone believes in the dangers of ai-alignment, the less faith they should have that it can be solved.
Sandy knows the sum and has now been told that Peter doesn't know the pair. If the sum had been 6, the following pairs are possible: (1+5) (3+3) (4+2), Peter has just ruled out (1x5) and (3x3), so Sandy would be able to narrow it down to (1,5) if the sum had been 6.
So when she tells Peter she can't narrow it down, it tells him that the pair isn't (4,2) either (among many others).
And if Peter's number were 8: (1x8) or (2x4) he'd be able to solve it, but he doesn't so Sandy then knows that (1,8) isn't the solution either.
Two numbers are chosen randomly, both are positive integers smaller than 100. Sandy is told the sum of the numbers, while Peter is told the product of the numbers.
Then, this dialog occurs between Sandy and Peter:
Peter: I don't know the numbers.
Sandy: I don't know the numbers.
Peter: I don't know the numbers.
Sandy: I don't know the numbers.
Peter: I don't know the numbers.
Sandy: I don't know the numbers.
Peter: I don't know the numbers.
Sandy: I don't know the numbers.
Peter: I don't know the numbers.
Sandy: I don't know the numbers.
Peter: I don't know the numbers.
Sandy: I don't know the numbers.
Peter: I don't know the numbers.
Sandy: I don't know the numbers.
Peter: I do know the numbers.
What are the numbers?
Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/math/comments/32opae/next_level_che...
Make those fixes and the numbers are much closer.
2) I'm surprised the dosage for moderna hasn't been reduced to 50 mcg for first and second doses (especially for young men) since it seems to provide similar protection to the full 100mcg doses: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X2...
3) I'd wager we end up with more frequent, smaller doses as this goes on. Moderna at 25 mcg was shown to have some protective effect, note however pfizer didn't reach marginal gains in antibody response, with dosages instead being limited by side-effects, but still had some effect at even 1 mcg (standard dose 30 mcg) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2814-7
4) A longer series of smaller doses might be preferable for the vaccine hesitant also - if you start getting noteworthy side-effects then you can terminate the programme.
-Frank M.
Edit: I looked into it, nope, Florida is utterly insane - a child didn't get consent to record their rapist soliciting/threatening them, so the evidence was denied;
On December 11, 2014, the Florida Supreme Court held in McDade v. State, 154 So. 3d 292 (Fla. 2014), that a defendant accused of child molestation has an expectation of privacy in conversations between him and his victim taking place in their shared residence where he asked her to have sex with him and also alluded to his prior acts of sexual abuse.
...
the court concluded that the Secrecy of Communications Act’s (SCA), F.S. Ch. 934, et seq. (2014), plain language barred the trial court’s admission of a recorded conversation between McDade and his victim into evidence. The decision may surprise some, especially when one considers that the victim’s actions in McDade also constituted a crime under the SCA and authorized the criminal defendant in that case to sue the victim under the statute’s civil cause of action
https://www.floridabar.org/the-florida-bar-journal/mcdade-v-...
https://caselaw.findlaw.com/fl-district-court-of-appeal/1633...
https://law.justia.com/cases/florida/supreme-court/2014/sc13...
They have since made a exclusion for this scenario, allowing children to record talking to their abusers.
>Noise is necessary for our brains to function in an orderly fashion. In the book The Signal and the Noise, Nate Silver says that “The signal is the truth. The noise is what distracts us from the truth.”7 Andrew Smart adds that “there are many circumstances in which the addition of the right amount of noise actually boosts the signal.” So within the randomness of the noise, we can achieve greater creativity as the randomness of evolution brings the best out of humans.
Value for sunlight should even be higher, the bulb is only a little too high. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daylight