I imagine there is enough content for a series like this to warrant guest posts (since we are biased towards paid SaaS web APIs).
4,593 karma · joined April 21, 2010
http://mikeknoop.com https://x.com/mikeknoop
I imagine there is enough content for a series like this to warrant guest posts (since we are biased towards paid SaaS web APIs).
I am curious, have you found that investors have changed their tune due to your successes so far?
http://instantdomainsearch.com has this same problem when deciding if a domain is actually available or not.
What's the qualitative difference which elicits a different response?
EDIT: For clarity, the idea is Kickstarter provides some sort of white-labelled page to show a counter and collect/skim funds. I have to imagine liability falls back to the originating company at that point.
""" A brief e-mail exchange ensued, culminating with a firm “No” – stating that Lockitron fell into the “home improvement” category of prohibited projects. """
Maybe it is HN bias, but all past popular Kickstarter launches seem to be products that would now be prohibited. I think Kickstarter is writing their own fate by not allowing these things. All the new popular launches are going to go off-site.
There are probably legal implications (and other problems) that come with being a "store" and Kickstarter does clearly not want that. But I can't envision the future of Kickstarter unless they come up with a solution to the store problem (and not by outright banning store-like products).
EDIT: Oh and NLTK, of course.
EDIT2: If you missed it, you can see all the posts here: http://prlibs.posterous.com/
Oh and if you're feeling generous, you can buy them for $2 a pop:
I would immediately recommend a service like this.
A replacement for traditional communication (instant messaging) that is built into everything.
http://tctechcrunch2011.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/boosted-...
compared to
http://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0119/3292/t/4/assets/slide_...
or
I think startups are, in a way, almost required to unlock the full potential of novel tech ideas. A startup can apply an awesome idea to a niche, gain traction, and expand whereas the defacto launch of a tech product at BigCo X or Y applies the tech across a broad segment of their user base. Broad launches are a good way to make your product generally available, but a bad way to ensure it truly solves some core need your customers have.
My guess is OP saw it via refer.ly and submitted it straight without stripping the identifier.
New bootstrapping strategy, anyone?