(and I generally think AI-produced content is slop).
60 karma · joined December 2, 2016
(and I generally think AI-produced content is slop).
I understand the educational value of what you made. You clearly overcame many technical hurdles to combine the platform with solid educational principles. Awesome stuff!
But another major step needed was to know that a great product, marketed poorly, is likely doomed. Ironically, a lesser product marketed well, will likely succeed- it can be improved as it gains attention (and revenue).
Sorry it didn’t work out. Maybe one day your personal runway will expand for it and you can explore how to put it in front of an audience.
Once you get an audience, and you know how to build that audience, you’ll get user feedback, adoption traction and can explore new audiences to share it with.
We’re in an age where they won’t come to you. You must go to them (with marketing, brand, building an audience).
With OpenAI I find ChatGPT just slows to a crawl and the chat becomes unresponsive. Asking it to make a document, to import into a new chat, helps with that.
On a human level, it makes me think that we should do the same ourselves. Reflect, document and dump our ‘memory’ into a working design doc. To free up ourselves, as well as our LLMs.
"grip strength is also an independent and significant predictor of all cause mortality. How strong your grip is, is going to tell us a ton about how you're going to live." https://zoe.com/learn/podcast-exercise-and-living-longer
Of course, some users, and at some level, we all want the hard docs. This is where you're moving down the engagement funnel, from orientation to the deepest murk!
I saw just yesterday 'is there a printable version of the docs so I can read them offline?'. A fair, but rare, request to make a point - don't cater for everyone's _preferences_ - that is risky.
It's a balance - but one I think if you need a screenshot to explain it, you should also consider how much it needed explaining. Is it work a screenshot, or a UX review?
X is already gone from my Home Screen to a folder. Second page! I struggle to see it having any relevance in the future at this rate.
My website is aimed at older children (education), it's no-code Bubble.io and I use google adsense to drive revenue. It _just about_ balances as cost neutral to operate. I do not update any content any more often than once every 3-5 years.
The problem is that's a multi year plan and governments like the UK right now can't see past September, then 2024, then whatever short term deadline's around the corner. It's pathetic.
1. Free = problematic with the lack of money
2. Freemium = looks good if the balance is right
3. Ads = Mostly works but the model is flawed and skewed
4. Subscription = Love/Hate currently trendy but too relied on
5. Pay-what-you-can = Fans provide the service for everyone
6. Premium only = Only what it's worth, when it's worth
7. Enterprise = S'ok because my company/org pays for it
8. Tokenised = S'ok because the next person pays for mine...
9. Charitable / foundation = Someone more wealthy pays
10. None of the above = For now somehow it works
There are probably 10 more models already, 10 more out there and 10 more coming soon. Get thinking, stop complaining.
Another take on future proof is around designing to avoid unwanted obsolescence; we have finite resources on this big rock, use what you can. Get creative. Not planning for the future will see you under water.
Id move off the official sonos software in a flash if there was a real alternative.
I was confused though, there appears to be no long story involving a grandmother and a rat named terry who used to nibble at the candles in your cabin. ETC! ;-)
Not getting a pension, of some kind, seems way riskier than living only with money in the immediate.
As always, the trick is:
1. Compound interest 2. Long-term 3. Diversify investments 4. Maintain control and awareness 5. Compound interest
It's a compound sandwich.