Reusing that design language but making the button and the arrow two completely different buttons with their own actions sets wrong expectations for no good reason.
125 karma · joined December 4, 2016
Reusing that design language but making the button and the arrow two completely different buttons with their own actions sets wrong expectations for no good reason.
Note that the law in Brazil forbid telecoms from charging to receive phone calls or messages, even when roaming. But I guess the regulations don't extend to foreign users that are on international roaming, or companies do it anyway counting that the person will only find out after returning home and won't know how to fight it. Authorities are not set up as well to receive complaints from non-residents.
Some airlines might not enforce that if you're deemed an important enough customer for them, but I just want to bring this up because being a no-show in the outbound flight and keeping the return flight is not a right that customers have in general, basically in any IATA airline. It's not really Lufthansa specific, those are rules that the whole industry applies.
In Sweden, when you contact the government by web form or mail, they warn you that every communication is by law part of the public record (metadata and contents), and you should not include anything sensitive that you do not want divulged.
This is not an argument defending screen time, just recognizing that it is a difficult problem with no easy solutions.
Do you think you're disrespectful when you write "Peru" (Portuguese dropped the diacritic from "Perú") or "Colômbia" (now we added a diacritic that is not in the original "Colombia")? What about "Paraguai": why is "Paraguay" so hard to type that we had to change it?
And this is coming from a sister language, Spanish.
I think you're not paying attention to how languages work.
I say this as a Brazilian myself, who is fond of the original spelling.
I live in Scandinavia, and do you feel it is fair for me to criticize you for writing Gotemburgo and not Göteborg, or Copenhague and not København?
The article is in English, the conversation is in English, and like it or not places like São Paulo are spelled without diacritics in English.
Or should an article in Portuguese in a Brazilian newspaper write Deutschland instead of Alemanha?
In the end you'll have two passports but one of them is now useless and it will be flagged the moment you actually use it for traveling. It may not be pleasant when you're abroad and the authorities catch you using an invalid travel document.
I guess it makes more sense if you never intend to use the old passport again for crossing borders?
[1] https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Databases/SLTD-datab...
If Brazil, a much poorer country in comparison, can do it then so does the US. I think that arguments in the contrary don't hold any water and are poor rationalizations ("US is special").
This is what I usually do: (1) check my bank 1 week before the end of each month, (2) eyeball the amounts for all e-invoices, (3) approve everything with a single click.
But in the last 30 years or so, I have noticed that many now celebrate completing high school, completing primary school, or even completing kindergarten (!) — and not just something symbolic or small, but big events.
Maybe I'm just old and grumpy, but this rubs me off in the wrong way: I also believe that these "achievements" are things that you are simply expected to do. Congratulations and positive reinforcement are always welcome, but when there is an expectation of a reward then to me it crossed the line into something unhealthy.
I cannot be sure, but I have this feeling that it is due to my formative years in that kind of environment.
As far as I understand, the EU closed this loophole for new members but it is turning a blind eye for Sweden.
It is fascinating to me that in practice there is this reversal of roles: Sweden is supposed to adopt the Euro and yet has a free-floating currency, and Denmark that has an opt-out deliberately chose to be in ERM-II and has a currency that is pegged to the Euro.
Regarding visitors, I believe the fees are not really enforced because you can argue that the goods will not stay in the country and enforcement could hamper tourism. But if someone shows up with two brand new laptops still in the box, they'll probably have some explaining to do in case they're selected for customs checks and want to convince them that they're strictly for personal use and it's not an import.
I still stand behind that such rules are the norm, not the exception. The problem in Brazil is not the rule, but the low limits. Regarding EU residents when visiting the US, very similar import rules still apply but the difference is that (1) the limits are higher, and (2) it's easier to take the things out of the packaging and argue those are your personal belongings that you left EU with [1], and (3) the majority are not checked. But even in EU the fact that you're not caught does not mean that the rule does not exist: when you purchase things abroad and they add up to more than your tax-free limit, you are supposed to walk through the "goods to declare" line before leaving the airport, just like in Brazil.
[1] In Brazil if you want to make this argument you have to report your item to customs when leaving the country and then you get a receipt that you can show on your way back to prove that you left the country with it. If you don't have such receipt, customs can argue the item is new and purchased abroad.
It is definitely about both mail and your luggage. The link in my previous reply specifically mentions luggage, including a whole FAQ. Tax free limit when entering by air is 500 USD.
May I ask where are you from? I am a bit puzzled by your surprise because I do not know a single country that does not have similar laws. The whole EU has analogous rules, for example (and I live in the EU). Those absolutely apply to your luggage, and also mail. The difference is in implementation details such as what qualifies as personal use, what is the tax-free allowance, and what are the fees. But the concept itself is not something odd that only Brazil does.
This is not different from many (most?) countries, except for the fact that the typical import tax in Brazil is probably way higher than the average country.
https://www.gov.br/receitafederal/pt-br/assuntos/aduana-e-co...
- Brazilian Supreme Federal Court annulled all the cases brought against Lula because the judge overseeing those cases (Moro) was found to be biased and have violated due process [1][2][3]. Leaked conversations from Telegram revealed that the judge and the prosecution were actually working together and conspired with the explicit goal to put Lula in jail.
- UN human rights commission also concluded that due process was violated [4].
- Lula was found guilty and arrested before the 2018 election. He was either leading the polls or a close 2nd. Judge Moro responsible for the sentence that blocked him from running and removed the main adversary for Bolsonaro was later offered the position of Minister of Justice for the Bolsonaro administration, which he accepted.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luiz_In%C3%A1cio_Lula_da_Silva... [2] https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/brazil-supreme-court-... [3] https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20210625-brazil-judge-... [4] https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2022/04/brazil-crimi...
- The law is from 1984
- Military dictatorship ended in 1985
- First election post-dictatorship happened in 1989
- Lula, the first left-wing president post-dictatorship, was elected for the first time in 2002