1,035 karma · joined April 5, 2010
My blog on growth: http://jwegan.com
> On March 24, 2014, Eich was promoted to CEO of Mozilla Corporation. Some employees of Mozilla Foundation tweeted calls for his resignation, with reference to his donation of $1,000 to California Proposition 8, which called for the banning of same-sex marriage in California. Eich stood by his decision to fund the campaign, but wrote on his blog that he was sorry for “causing pain” and pledged to promote equality at Mozilla. Some of the activists created an online campaign against Eich, with online dating site OkCupid automatically displaying a message to Firefox users with information about Eich's donation, and suggesting that users switch to a different browser (although giving them a link to continue with Firefox). Others at the Mozilla Corporation spoke out on their blogs in his favor. Board members wanted him to stay in the company in a different role. On April 3, 2014, Eich resigned as CEO and left Mozilla; in his personal blog, he posted, "under the present circumstances, I cannot be an effective leader".
1) Neither SPOT or WORK has done great, especially WORK
2) IPO allows you to choose your investors. This gives you the opportunity to choose major institutional investors that are in for the long term which will help reduce stock volatility.
3) Even if you don't need money, raising billions can open up a lot of opportunities for the business and give you a warchest to derisk potential market downturns.
Lyft is IPOing at a higher valuation than Twitter, but Facebook went public at a valuation of $100B and raised $16B. FB's IPO was 5x bigger than Lyft's.
I've been 5 years and from what I gather there was some bartering >10 years ago (not sure the exact date, but my impression is it was in the 90s). However, it shifted to a "gifting" economy where you give out gifts with no expectation of return and any Burner who hears that characterized as bartering would be quick to correct you.
I don't work on Pinterest's ads business and I'm not very familiar with that side of the company. I'm speaking as someone who runs ads on other sites to try and drive traffic to Pinterest.
Also, like the other poster said, an ad-hominem attack is a classic logic fallacy. You are criticizing who is saying it and did not bring up a single critique of my actual argument.
If Apple really wanted to protect user privacy, they would provide something similar to the iAd Framework they provide for their own Apple App Store Ads, where the app can ping the iAd Framework to tell if the user installed the app from an Apple App Store ad and monitor the users long term engagement, while Apple handles all the attribution on their end. If Apple took the same approach they use for their own App Store Ads it would be a big step forward in helping protect user privacy and eliminate the need for all the fingerprinting, etc that some ad networks do.
The fact they didn't, I feel this is nothing more than a fluff PR move by Apple and does not seem genuine.
Pinterest helps over 150 million people discover ideas for their life. Whether it is recipes for dinner, planning their next vacation, or livening up their backyard, people use Pinterest to plan for the future.
We are hiring for many positions (to see other roles and apply, check out https://careers.pinterest.com/), but my team is specifically looking for two roles.
1) Backend Infrastructure engineer to work on scaling our email & notification systems. We deliver billions of emails/notifications a month and need someone who can be a technical leader on the team and help drive scaling of these platforms.
2) Localization engineer to help improve and build out our translation and localization framework. As the first full-time dedicated engineer on localization you will have a lot of ownership and be responsible for helping improve Pinterest's translatations for over 100 million users outside of the US.
If you're interested in either of the roles I listed, email me at jwegan@pinterest.com
However over the past 5 years FB has been trying to drive up engagement off the News Feed through allowing apps to publish to timeline, and encouraging people to post links to articles and videos, etc. For me, Facebook today fundamentally is no longer fulfilling its core product value of helping me stay connected to what is going on in my friends lives. Apps like Snapchat have now taken that role because they are able to deliver on that value in a way Facebook is no longer able to.
The real math is 33.6% to investors holding a >5% stake, 38.8% to execs & directors, and 27.6% not represented (probably a mix of investors and the employee option pool)
http://jwegan.com/growth-hacking/hacking-mobile-invites-with...
class A(object):
def __init__(self, x, y):
self.__dict__.update((k,v) for k,v in locals().items() if k != 'self')>>> I wanted a job at Evernote, and I wanted it bad. So I put in my 100 hours.