That answer is quality content (higher than AI or human medians), links and pr and social activity and mentions, and then user experience.
1,429 karma · joined October 10, 2011
Email me: joe at greenflagdigital dot com
That answer is quality content (higher than AI or human medians), links and pr and social activity and mentions, and then user experience.
Thanks for releasing this, it’s important to unleash government information that we’ve paid for as tax payers, especially if there’s 0 risk to national security.
In this case I may be missing something on enemy military missions to extract cyanide from rare American apples and use it against us.
I have so many bundled-up ideas for content in my head, but I can never find time to get them out. In addition, I hate wasting time on building tables, formatting text, etc. There's a reason that a lot of busy CEOs don't hand-write blog posts, but will go on podcasts, video, and conferences, and spend hours there. The reason is that the communication speed is much faster talking and being interviewed. All that to say is that via a combination of transcription and AI-powered formatting, that's an area where LLMs can really help.
I do think LLMs + search is more helpful than a Google Search. Clicking through all the links for you and bundling it together is a much better experience and truthfully it finds and surfaces ideas and content that a normal search just doesn't, or it takes the user going to the 4th page to get there.
Third, entertainment. We often find ourselves deep in a doomscroll looking at images and video - on Instagram, TikTok, whatever. If AI can produce entertaining imagery and video for the pure goal of decompressing and relaxing after a long day out at the oil fields or as a janitor at the elderly care home, then there's value there. Sure it may not be beautiful art like an Oscar-winning film, but is it worse than reality TV? Even better is those who enjoy the creativity of seeing images from their mind produced vividly via something like Midjourney.
So all that being said, that's where I'm seeing the value.
But I totally agree with the author - if I have a team member that puts work in front of me that's supposed to be well done, and it's obviusly GPT-generated, that's an issue - unless we agreed on it.
The point of doing good work a lot of times means doing something new and creative. If it's AI-generated, there still has to be the human touch. I could go on - we all have perspectives here - but I'll stop there!
And the question is more about whether it’s currently primarily a luxury option as a headline idea, with a thousand different caveats.
Transferring a Principal Residence Value within a County
“Proposition 60 (Revenue and Taxation Code 69.5)
Property owners of at least 55 years of age may transfer the base year value of their principal residence to a replacement principal residence. The replacement must be of equal or lesser current market value and located within the same county. Sacramento County does not allow base year transfers from other counties.”
https://assessor.saccounty.net/LowerMyTaxes/BaseYearValueTra...
If you look at the entire US, and assume you have the ability to move and live in any state, there are lots of options for everyone at every income level. (Disclaimer that this doesn’t address poverty, DEI, and other limitations to a good chunk of citizens).
From the Gold Rush, to Hollywood, to East Coasters moving to health spas like Carlsbad or Calistoga, some moved here for necessity but many out of choice and luxury.
A lot more to unpack here but I think it’s interesting.
But you’re right, they need to take the burn for awhile until escape velocity. I think they did with YouTube in general until the ads money hit.
They’re also more geeky and not that creative of a company, nor do they really get design, so some of their blind spots can hurt them from time to time, although that’s separate from their AI issues which yes they have bungled their lead do to fears of the feds.
Examples would be the fact that Samsung almost always beats them to the punch on camera technology and other whiz-bang features, but Apple eventually adopts to much mass market consumer acclaim and groans from Android techies. Another example is they’re just now considering touch screen on laptops.
A counter example is the TouchBar - which was “innovative” but many didn’t like.
But I’m slowly coming around to the camp that for specific searchers where you want a quick answer, ChatGPT beats Google hands down and my searching habits are changing. Interesting times.
Yes there may (likely?) be backchannel off the record conversations between Google search engineers and executives at companies, but that’s more limited and not at scale. Google’s not (likely) giving organic ranking preferences to Dick’s Sporting Goods because they advertise via AdWords.
There may be lunch chats between Pinterest and Google engineers, however.