4,576 karma · joined August 5, 2008
And we’re living in a consumer economy. Kill off mid to high salaries and you kill off demand. Unless AI buys the toys.
They're not seeing a loss of students, so there's interest in studies, but perhaps a shift in what's considered employable. Interesting that there's no mention of science or PhD - I assume ETH offers the former and I've been in groups in ancient times that offer the latter.
While ai might or will get involved in the theory or descriptive portions, there’s a whole lot of lab work that isn’t easily automated and which doesn’t lie in the current body of knowledge. New ways to make stuff at the bench, or new stuff made at the bench. These are what gets people their organic phd’s. Some schools are sufficiently complex and endowed to include medchem work which proposes and makes new drug matter. In these cases, theses will be large and representative of pushing the state of the art forward.
FWIW, social security and Medicare taxes are noticeably higher in the US than Canada. Pay more get more.
Enjoy every sandwich is a nice, mildly flippant way of saying that one should enjoy every moment. You only get so many and you don't know how many that is. Jackson Browne's For A Dancer also addresses this.
And in the end, it's never enough.
Lock everything down and everybody's going to stop reading cuz they're not going to pay for the text and they're not going to hack their way in. And if AI is generating said text, it's going to be wordy.
Given the lab requirements, there's little undergraduates at uni can do in Science. They can participate in a paper, but they spend a lot of time trying not to hurt each other and develop some kinds of lab skills. And if they're p-chem or theoretical, they might not even get lab skills (more engineering). Some schools offer their lab-oriented majors the chance to intern at a biotech/pharma, and THAT has a major impact on hire-ability. But w/o the PhD, they're headed for lab tech.
For CS, on the other hand, you can build entire systems independent of attending uni. So yeah, what-you-have-done is usually more significant than what-did-you-study. Given this, trying to wedge Science and Technology together really isn't useful. Didn't some of the techbros call uni a waste of key programming years? Similar to how footy views uni vs. youth programs.
The won because people think complex problems have simple, untried solutions that are common sense. They hate "them", they're stoked on (social) media. They feel put upon and denied their rewards. Same old, same old with more effective communication paths.
And they’ll have to pay for the load on their utilities and air as it runs. Possibly noise as well. NIMBY makes sense for these things outside of remote sites with lots of natural power and water.
I wonder how loud they'd yowl if "no trade with Canada" gores their ox?