1,958 karma · joined February 21, 2013
Predictions of when you will die need a range in order to be attached to a number like accuracy. The attached report is not about this but about population-level mortality trends.
"Life insurers can predict when you'll die with about 98% accuracy." Is not even properly framed and is found nowhere in the cited report.
Predictions of when you will die need a range in order to be attached to a number like accuracy. The attached report is not about this but about population-level mortality trends.
Much more work is needed to show that this means anything.
It's clear that superhuman citation depth & breadth is already imminent. Hopefully we can push hallucinations to near-zero with the next generation of models.
My hope is that computer vision + OCR will solve this once and for all in near future.
Intellectual Farnam Street, Shane Parrish [farnamstreetblog.com/blog] Less Wrong [http://lesswrong.com/] [lesserwrong.com] Raw Thought, Aaron Swartz [aaronsw.com/weblog] Slate Star Codex [slatestarcodex.com] Edge [http://edge.org/] Melting Asphalt, Kevin Simler [http://www.meltingasphalt.com/] Essays, Paul Graham [paulgraham.com/articles.html] Minding Our Way, Nate Soares [http://mindingourway.com/] Ribbonfarm, Venkatesh Rao [ribbonfarm.com] Overcoming Bias, Robin Hanson [overcomingbias.com] Shtetl-Optimized, Scott Aaronson [http://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/] Raikoth, Scott Alexander [http://web.archive.org/web/20140220082152/http://raikoth.net...] Heterodox Academy [https://heterodoxacademy.org/]
Technology Hacker News [https://news.ycombinator.com/] Worrydream, Bret Victor [http://worrydream.com/] Naval Ravikant [https://startupboy.com/] Unenumerated, Nick Szabo [http://unenumerated.blogspot.com/] Stratchery [http://stratchery.com/]
Statistics DataTau [http://www.datatau.com/] FiveThirtyEight [fivethirtyeight.com] Simply Statistics [https://simplystatistics.org/] Chris Olah [colah.github.io]
Economics Marginal Revolution [marginalrevolution.com] Project Syndicate [project-syndicate.org]
"We’re taking down these Pages, Groups and accounts based on their behavior, not the content they posted."
"[Uber] said it had suspended testing of its self-driving cars in Tempe, Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Toronto"[1]
1: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/19/technology/uber-driverles...
In the absence of social media, do people simply replace their wasted time there with leisure like video games, television, texting, and the like? If yes, the net impact of Facebook is small.
Or, have the addictivity wizards actually managed to increase the amount of time spent in leisure, taking away from familial connection and deep friendships?
With Facebook in particular, there's a generated sense of belonging that comes along with the quantified social proof which makes the hits of dopamine much more personal and meaningful. I see this as trading off against getting that sense of connection in reality.
But much of the other 'damage' from Facebook is fungible, and people would turn to other sources of leisure and addiction soon after losing it. Perhaps one day these addictive engines will be powerful enough to make this untrue, but we're not there quite yet.
All that said, open code for running this on arbitrary data is great to have! A thanks to Oleksii Kuchaiev.
Frameworks (say, DL4J) have been using Keras as a loose way to share models between frameworks. It'll be fascinating to see if Theano / Tensorflow / DL4J / MXNet walk this path as well.