29 karma · joined May 15, 2018
set -Ux DOCKER_HOST (podman info -f '{{ .Host.RemoteSocket.Path }}')> Siacoin can be efficiently mined with ASIC mining machines.
Not sure why you implied there was any need to look further into this. It seems to be based on proof of waste.
Maybe exerting our collective power for the public good through democracy? Some kind of new commerce regulation that would disallow bundling in general? I wonder, are there arguments that there would there be any downsides to doing that? Does anyone believe that bundling is a net positive in any sector?
The only thing that works for me is finding the video in my watch history that's causing the recommendations and removing it there. Often it's even something I didn't watch all the way through or even gave a thumbs-down; apparently thumbs-down also means I secretly want more of this content?
YouTube's recommendation algorithm is somehow worse than useless.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLrpJQJ3tlvklPADcz-WML... (channel: The Quantified Scientist, playlist: Withings Scanwatch)
Not great unfortunately.
I think it's far more important to have a consistent framerate than it is to worry about wasting potential (fast) frames. Inconsistent smoothness and input lag will create a disadvantage compared to just playing at a capped (lower) framerate.
So I think a balanced system (both the hardware and the graphical settings) with a 144hz monitor should be able to run games at far beyond 144 fps most of the time, so that the framerate will only drop down to around 144 in the worst moments. I would even suggest setting a framerate limit near the worst framerate your system often drops down to in the game.
How much your hardware needs to be "overprovisioned" depends on how poorly optimized the game is. For many games this can as much as a factor of two difference. So you might only be putting 50% load on your GPU most of the time, but peak at 100% load at important times.
Pop's desktop environment looks like a barely customized Gnome3 session to me. I'm not sure I would even call it a fork. Looks more like just a theme.
Pantheon (Elementary) is more of a fork of Gnome3, reusing some low level parts but presenting a much different experience to the user.
In typing position, your arms are not parallel. Neither are the fingers of one hand parallel with the other. Doesn't that make the standard staggered layout more ergonomic than ortho? Isn't that the reason for the staggering?
That methodology sounds like it would only be valid if each type of harm functioned entirely independently and was only affected by a single intake factor?
The words "carbohydrate" and "calorie" appear nowhere in the study. Did they allow the effects of caloric malnutrition to skew the calculations of optimal intake levels?
If consuming more carbohydrates is helpful compared to being malnourished, that does nothing to show that there's a minimum level of fruit and grains that are necessary for health.
If adding more fat intake to a high carbohydrate diet is harmful, that doesn't necessarily mean fat is universally unhealthy.
This just seems like a report of correlations that are biased by the distribution of diets that are being commonly consumed.
However, it seems like something that would need clever UI integration to really solve the problem. Any user oriented actions like github starring, reddit upvoting/saving, browser bookmarking, etc. might need to also do a pin?
Your video seems to be about a pedophile who is upset that the LGBT community isn't inclusive of pedophilia. I don't understand what point you were trying to make by linking that.
It sounds like you're saying people ought to go back to being homophobic, for example, because it will save us from a slippery slope to pedophilia?
Their customers can't do that without incurring ridiculous early termination fees. And many of them don't have any other option for broadband anyway.
Further, I suspect boycotts very rarely work even against companies that aren't quasi-monopolies.
Are clocks too unreliable or is there too much NAT because everybody's too lazy to implement IPv6 still?
They also know that any award they might receive will be smaller, and that if they do not win the case, the process will be costly and without appeal.
If the win rates remain unchanged after filtering out most of the consumer/employee complainants who don't have a slam dunk case, that is likely because there is systemic bias.