graderjs

How can you think about something if you've never seen it and it doesn't make sense based on your worldview? Well there's definitely ways that you can view it from a more open viewpoint! Ha ha ha! :) And lots to view: plenty of things we've observed and don't understand! Ha ha ha! :)

Damn, can't change it! Thank you ha ha ha! :)

No, but the idea of a totality of physics is: that there's nothing outside it that we don't understand. That's very anthropocentric. And heard in the dismissals people give of possibilities or observations that "violate a law of physics".

There are some pretty weird stuff out there outside the average UAP cannon — of metallic orbs, cigars and clamshells — that may qualify as your intrusions; good word!

Science lives at the edge of the unknown. In this era I think we need to engage in far-out speculation if we're going to understand what comes — especially if we hope to understand it from a non-anthropocentric point of view! Ha ha ha! :)

That is what we see, it's just suppressed — with ridicule, and dismissal.

Also, our physics is a human model remember: it's completely anthropocentric. As is the human propensity seemingly to assume that's all the physics there is.

There's ways you can make it less extraordinary.

0) What if interdimensional travel is easier than we think, we just haven't figured out the hack yet. Ergo: they're not actually that advanced.

0.5) What if they're hyper-specialized? They're really good at crossing dimensions but not so good at conventional flight.

0.618) What if they're hyper-efficient, and sending these craft for them is like us manufacturing widgets in a manual factory? As in they've reduced the cost so much that a few trips having "defects" is normal and within an acceptable QA tolerance for them?

1) What if unreliability is a fundamental property of interstellar/interdimensional (or whatever we think this is) travel. In a physical-law type of way analogous to the uncertainty principle specifying an inviolable tradeoff between precision of position and momentum.

2) What if they're very promiscuous? What if there's 200 craft in Earth's atmosphere right now, and basically constantly for 1000 years. Assume they arrive and depart at basically constant rate of 40 per second (20 in / 20 out). For 90 years of cover up that's 110,730,240,000: or 110 billion. Assume they only crash on entry or exit. Assume that 20 craft have crashed in that time. That means they have a 1 in 5.5 billion chance of crashing. Googling estimates of airline crashes gives 1 in 1 million to 1 in 11 million. Making them 500 to 5000 times more reliable. Checks out.

I think the extraordinary thing is taking a default anthropocentric point of view, and extrapolating it to the whole universe, and having a high expectation that's highly likely to be valid.

* * *

Yeah! Except not all flies are associated with poo. Ha ha ha! :)

I laughed out loud in the video when the narration was like "It seems like they can see the future. They can see you coming from any angle. This is because they have " goes on to describe their incredible compound eyes, 100 times faster sense data processing versus humans, faster reactions. So cool! :)

Ha ha ha! :) If you find that there, it's about nobody but you! Ha ha ha! :)

Ha ha! If that's as far as you want to go, don't blame your lack of adventure on inadequate evidence, own your view! Ha ha! :)

You will find your way back to that curiosity and openness that's your nature. When — is up to you. Ha ha ha! :) Can't help you man! Ha ha ha! :)

Gosh that's a good call!! :)

A hahaha! :) a duck? That’s a funny one.

You mean a humanoid duck-alien pilot flying that soup can UFO, right? Ha ha ha! :)

Right, I thought that at first but then I went with the opposite! Gave it to much time to cook, I suppose! Ha ha ha! :)

Ha ha ha! :) A sequence of y/n questions. A human is not a computer, you really don't know people, do you? Ha ha ha! :)

No, I am so much more than you can fathom. Your model of me is nothing, yet people can know the mind and more of another, a skill you have not yet mastered, I see. Ha ha ha! :)

You worry too much, and have not taken responsibility for your opinions, so you are lost in confusion. I could teach you how, but, I don't think you're ready. Ha ha ha! :)

Tyrany was your analogy. I assume you mean an unjust and illegitimate imposition upon the common good, is alike to an unjust and illegitimate imposition against common sens.

You don't see how secrecy could be placed in the same position with regard to some other thing?

Left as an exercise for the reader. Let me know if you want the next tip! Ha ha ha! :)

Try a different tea? Lapsang Soochong or Pu-er for stronger flavor? Herbal teas are good if caffeine is what is disagreeing with you: red bush tea (rooibos), chamomile. Matcha is also good if caffeine is OK for you. If you like bitterness it probably sounds kind of weird but you can steep some lingzhi mushroom dried slices in water and after steeping a while it's pretty bitter. There's probably other mushrooms you can find too.

Or just go simple and sip water, maybe you'll find infinite "wateriness" is like no wateriness at all! Ha ha ha! :) You can add like tobasco to it, or bitters, or bitter gourd if you want bitter.

a very good app

Ha ha ha! :) what duck video? I love duck videos. But no, they haven’t done it: if they have craft if they have biologicals if they’ve managed to develop any tech (which they haven’t) then they should release all of that is what I mean. At this point they have released nothing, they’ve shown nothing: zero results, just whistleblowers testimony; all talk, no action. Ha ha ha! :)

Key quote: [said a source who testified to ICIG and Congressional committees] “There are people who say we have reverse-engineered them and are flying them. I never found any support for that. And found a lot of support for saying we can’t figure it out. If we do, it would be in some program at a higher security level.”

Now you see the reason for the disinfo campaign, as well as 90 years of fear and denial: the embarrassing secret - "We don't know". We can't figure it out. We can't control it. We can't reproduce or operate it.

The existence of aliens and superior-to-human technologies massively challenges government/corporate authority and power, and it terrifies them. People on the other hand, are pretty open and curious about such things, but humanity's power structures? Terrified. Hence, 90 years of fear and denial, and disinformation.

It's sad, but it's the banal truth. We're too dumb to understand it. Yet. They should just step up, release it, show they are leaders we can count on, no matter where humanity may be in the universal cosmic totem pole. No matter our ignorance or level of advancement we need to know we can trust our leaders. Not have them running and hiding at the first thing that exceeds us in a panic that we'll no longer listen to them and they'll "lose control". That sad, bullshit and pathetic attitude, ney, mistake has likely cost us all a lot, and a lot of people, sadly, everything.

Getting it out there, owning our ignorance and vulnerability, being upfront, being stand up about this, is the only way forward. Then, with everyone focused on it, instead of bullshit high-level inter-nations competition/collaboration in illegal deep-black programs that for all their bullshit secrecy have made zero progress and have nothing to show, for all their blood and treasure spilled to keep the lid on the "embarrassing secret", then and only then, when it's all out, might we have a chance to advance, make progress and figure it out. Because together, we can do anything. But fighting each other? We may as well let the aliens take over, because if that's how we act, and there really are evil ones out there, they've already won.

Release the fucking totality of it. Oppose anyone who gets in the way of that. Simple.

Yeah! What’s that weird filter they have on the camera? I love the fluoro lightsaber magenta color of it, and the topological patterning of the ripples. Kind of reminds me of something from my childhood. I can’t put my finger on where I’ve seen this type of thing before.

Ha ha ha! :) Thanks for the side note, do you have any answer to the actual question? Ha ha ha! :)

I guess it's like an entrance fee to stop the club getting overcrowded. Apple Developer support forums, apple developer support, the App Review process...all these things take resources and are probably already overloaded (or pushed to limit). The fee helps keep check of that, like charging people for your side-project development work. Sure, you could do it for free (as you have a main income) but charging clients helps you manage and prioritize your workload.

Incidentally I've made back my Apple Developer fee in app revenue, so that's cool. Ha ha ha! :)

Will this make it possible to link in standalone libraries as like a single bundle easily and distribute that without having to worry about local installations?

E.g., I tried to bundle ffmpeg as a library with my voice memo transcription MacOS app^0, but it was too difficult, so I just went with building a standalone ffmpeg binary (~40MB), and instrumenting it with a bash script that I called from the Objective-C code, ha ha ha! :)

0: https://apps.apple.com/us/app/wisprnote/id1671480366?mt=12

Ha ha ha! :) You need to know the full story: Grusch brought witnesses with evidence in front of IG / oversight committees who deemed it urgent and credible. His public tip-of-the-iceberg is for his own safety, but whistleblower law only covers him disclosing to Congress, not public. It's less about trusting him, and more about trusting the processes of your government. But yeah, totally understand if you don't trust that! Ha ha ha! :)

Also, how the Debrief initially fact-checked (NYT 2017 Navy Ufo reporters) Ralph Blumenthal and Leslie Kean's Grusch story: https://thedebrief.org/fact-check-q-a-with-debrief-co-founde...

Just settle on flag it because you can't handle the truth yet. Ha ha ha! :)

Ha ha ha! :) No, I replied the right one, you need to own your own opinion, but just go to your own limit, and remember you don't know me, so don't pretend you do, okay? Ha ha ha! Good! :)

Grusch also brought these people in front of Congressional oversight committees to testify. There should be more info from Grusch dropping soon on NewsNation or the Need to Know podcast. They did a 7 hour interview with him, as they talk about in this behind-the-scenes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQjbFZT9_EM

Ha ha ha! :) I wonder what perturbed you in what I said that you got to pretend that! Ha ha ha! :)

Well you sound like you're doubting your own process. So that's good! First step. You also sound like you have trouble seeing things through other people's eyes, that's also good! Where you should go next! Mind expansion without drugs. You're welcome! Ha ha ha! :)

Yes, that's what I'm saying. My post was a video! But there's also an article, ha ha ha! :) There's lots of content about this story now. And the Guardian and Fox have now picked it up. Which is good I guess. Apparently there will be much more testimony from Grusch dropping on the "Need to Know" podcast soon.

Can’t empathize with people with the “wrong” skin color or genetics? That’s very racist. It’s very telling

I totally want to get this thing! This is awesome! Ha ha ha! :) I don't know if I'd like it, but I certainly want to try it. Looks fucking great! Ha ha ha :)

That's cool that website! https://updb.app UPDB is an open database of unexplained phenomena (UFO/UAP) reports. Wow didn't know about that.

I guess you know the "insider theory" as to why UFOs came after nukes: it's that nuclear weapons explosions send shockwaves through the "cosmic web" and interdimensionally, that fucks up aliens' realms/dimensions. So we think it's bad here, but somewhere else something else bad is going on. I wonder if that's a secret reason why countries shifted to underground tests, and then a ban. Too much ET pushback - ha ha ha! :)

But just now I'm thinking how is a nuclear explosion different to a star? Maybe because latter is gravitationally stabilized and "in equilibrium" with its environment? I don't know. That's why we need to science the shit out of it! Rather than having anything we may know and have locked in super secret programs, amenable to crazy disinfo and all this other bullshit! Ha ha ha! :)