193 karma · joined September 25, 2010
- Michael W. Lucas, author: https://bsd.network/@mwlucas
- Amanda Rousseau, malware researcher: https://mastodon.social/@malwareunicorn
- Brendan Eich, creator of Javascript: https://mastodon.social/@BrendanEich
- John Scalzi, author: https://mastodon.social/@scalzi
- Jenn Schiffer, artist and dev at Glitch: https://toot.cafe/@jenn
(Completely unrelated but the first thing that came to mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKdgDX2dGh0)
You'd have to take those data points in isolation and conclude "men like money more than women" to earn that label.
I don't think anyone is surprised to see evidence that an exclusive workplace culture contributes to the pay gap. I'd posit that all else being equal, women value compensation and culture about the same as men. The priorities reflected in the survey are a symptom of the problem, not the cause.
(But seriously, play the music that makes you happy! The sonatas and partitas are amazing on guitar!)
"Each of these later [complex manned] missions was assigned the responsibility of a senior engineer who assumed a more technical management role for the program....Names notable here are Dr. James Miller for the first Lunar Module program SUNBURST, Dr. Frederic Martin for the Command Module program COLOSSUS, and George Cherry for the Lunar Module program LUMINARY. These last two were the programs used for the lunar landing missions....
"Much of the detailed code of these programs was written by a team of specialists led by Margaret Hamilton. The tasks assignments to these individuals included, in addition to writing the code, the testing to certify that the program element met requirements."
[0] https://www.wired.com/2015/10/margaret-hamilton-nasa-apollo/
[0] https://www.nasa.gov/home/hqnews/2003/sep/HQ_03281_Hamilton_...
[1] https://news.mit.edu/2016/scene-at-mit-margaret-hamilton-apo...
My mom has a STEM degree, and her mom had a bleeding edge Thinkpad when the rest of my family was married to a beige box. My dad is a system administrator, and his dad is a chemical engineer. I have a postgraduate degree in software engineering. To assume any of us are technically incompetent because of our age or gender is insulting, and exclusionary.
Thanks for pointing that out.
I'm not an entrepreneur, but isn't sacrificing something part of the deal, regardless of gender or life circumstances? If you're launching a startup and trying to get VC funding, doesn't it go without saying that you're sacrificing things to that goal?
If that's the case, isn't the real problem that VCs are more comfortable with a man sacrificing his physical/mental health, family relationships, material belongings, retirement savings, etc. than with a woman sacrificing the same things? Or put another way, will VCs believe that a woman entrepreneur can balance her sacrifices against the good of her company as well as a man can balance his?
Out-of-context quote from the VC:
> I think mother's [sic] have more important things to do
> Be mother's [sic]
> But I'm old school
That's not a man saying "I think mothers have different priorities," that's a man saying "I have different priorities for mothers."
So...like PHP, then?
[0] https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/426zsv/pipethi...
[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/golang/comments/4261he/pipethis_sto...
(Full disclosure: I've done some work for the Where's It Up folks.)
/s (GREETINGS, MY ITHACAN BROTHER)
Another missing component here is user control. I can turn off the commercial and stop playing the game. I'm currently working (in a minor capacity) on the National Children's Study, and our participants can walk away at any time. When the Facebook subjects on the negative side started feeling slightly more sad, they had no idea why, and no clue how to stop it.
In general, A/B testing is studying the website. You're not testing us, you're testing the best ways to convince us to do stuff. On top of that, when users visit your website (which is presumably pitching something to them), they know they're being pitched. They know the website is going to try to convince them to do stuff--click over here, watch this video, sign up for foogadgetmcawesome. Same drill with advertising. Yeah, this commercial with the freaking Budweiser puppy made me cr--er, chop onions--in its attempt to get me to buy beer, but I know they're trying to sell me beer, and I knew as soon as the puppy hit the screen that I'd probably start sniffling.
Ignoring the classic "I'm sorry you were freaked out" non-apology here, this response completely misses the point, and tries to re-frame the concept of informed consent into an inconsequential piece of red tape that anxious people worry about.
People were made subjects of a scientific experiment without their knowledge or consent. It doesn't matter that Facebook took steps to make the changes as small as possible; it doesn't matter that the effect on the individual subjects may have been minor; it doesn't matter that the results were interesting. It was an ethical breach, and this tone-deaf response is fairly unsettling.
Assuming you're in the US, check some of the mail you've received recently; do you see a jagged-looking barcode on the front? It can uniquely identify that specific piece, as well as the mailer and any special services applied--mostly requesting higher levels of tracking. The metadata for that piece lives in a big postal database in the sky, where mailers can request access at varying levels of detail. The USPS is way past just delivering mail at this point.
(Source: I was a developer in the postal mail industry for six years.)
You are hilarious.
Great end result for me, but painful at the time. I'm looking forward to the day when tech isn't something girls like me get punted into by accident.