914 karma · joined February 15, 2009
So long as we, the consumer, allow this to happen businesses like Apple and Google will continue to do it.
Anecdotally and in my experience, there have been many complaints about fatigue for the Quest, and I wonder if Apple will be able to get away with more premium materials in the future versions. It seems like there will be a big tradeoff between adoption and the materials used.
Vision isn't out, but I am curious what V2 looks like and/or a version that optimizes to comfort.
I am getting so mentally exhausted learning about a specific problem, and then experiencing the helplessness of not knowing how to push on driving towards some mutually agreeable resolution.
Add in the fact that there is no way to seemingly coordinate the push towards a resolution. Individuals taking action without coordination feels just the same as taking no action at all. Are there any tools to coordinate the push and keep track of progress?
See this link -> https://interestingengineering.com/science/new-viral-video-r...
And this one about BPA which is quite cringeworthy from Coca-Cola -> https://www.coca-cola.ca/faqs/coca-cola-faqs-health/do-coca-...
I expect more comments on how to influence this technology versus dismissing it as not applicable for the human race.
Would be great to have the title updates as well.
Is this the future of technology we really want for ourselves?
It seems odd that the CDC updated this new recommendation and explicitly called out an antigen test is what one should use after the 5 day period of isolation.
While the concept is alluring, "own a digital good", the reality is that you still need some authentication mechanism to prove someone has the right to sell the digital good in the first place. This means centralization. I am fascinated that people lack the ability to scrutinize this appropriately.
At this point, my decision to use a particular piece of software or a specific feature within an OS/App/Website/etc based on perceived risk of that software being neglected.
Usually you can make this call based on features being added, but most of the time it's a gamble.
“Researchers at the University of Pennsylvania used a “search” algorithm to find dozens of potential antimicrobial peptides in the human body.”
Journal is linked at the bottom of the article as well.
While these capabilities do not map 1:1 to how this plugin works it seems like a bit of a middle ground for the researchers to be able to research ads without risking privacy of people or violating terms of service.
(Disclaimer - I work at FB)
See:
https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/?active_status=all&ad_t...
https://www.facebook.com/ads/library/api/?source=archive-lan...
http://www.forbes.com/sites/timworstall/2015/08/16/the-econo...
In the case of A, I utilize the Facebook SDK which relies on the Third-Party Facebook cookie passed into my application when it is loaded in a Facebook.com iframe. Could I build my application a little different to not need this? Yes, but this way is a little more reliable and secure. B.) Google Analytics breaks for IE users when your application lives within any iframe. It relies on Third-Party cookies to correctly track the users actions, and browser information.
I am a big user advocate when it comes to protection of personal information, but I really believe that unless users stop using IE (which is not going to happen any time soon), or P3P is depreciated by Microsoft then for now it is a useful hack to get around yet another IE pitfall.
It is this concept of entertainment that makes Facebook what it is today. A single source of entertainment, and a place to peak deeper into the lives of those around you with or without participating in those lives. As with many different forms of entertainment if you indulge too deeply you are consumed by your indulgence.
For the time being Facebook has a place on the internet. Will it be a main stay for years to come? Well that is very hard to predict. I truly believe Facebook's biggest internet value add will come in the form of an online digital pass. I feel those leading Facebook's directions also believe that too. If they can satisfy the majority of its users basic desire for entertainment, continue to build out the graph API, and keep giving more reasons for businesses to utilize the graph API then soon enough Facebook will will realize what Microsoft never was able to with the Microsoft Passport from the Internets early days.
I am starting to believe that if you have a web company ALL your employees should have some sort of programming experience before they are hired for non-programming jobs. I know this may be untrainable to do, but it might be the best thing a business does for itself.
I hope you rethink your intentions here and in future posts about this terrible conflict attempt to be more evenly considerate. Remember there are always two sides to every story.
Thank you.