810 karma · joined March 30, 2018
People say that a microservice is something that "fits in your head". Once the logic gets too complex, you should separate it into another service. Maybe in the future the phrase will be "what fits in the AI's context". That would be a good litmus test: if a piece of software is hard for an AI, maybe we should simplify it - because it is probably too hard for the average human as well.
The link in the OP is an example of what people may encounter if they follow said routes https://www.euronews.com/2016/12/10/italian-tourist-killed-a...
When news came out that those routes were being chosen to make the app more "inclusive", I found it amusing how someone in Palo Alto presenting a PowerPoint with a couple of ESG slides could lead to someone else being shot with an AK-47.
If the above sounds unreal: https://www.reddit.com/r/brasilivre/comments/mtfwfq/carro_do...
In the same week, Google releases something that looks like last year's MidJourney and it doesn't follow your prompt, making you discard 3 out of 4 results, if not all. If that was billed, no one would use it.
My only guess is that they are trying to offer this as entertainment to serve ads alongside it.
shaving razor -> gilete (instead of "lâmina de barbear")
chewing gum -> chiclete (instead of "goma de mascar")
cotton swab -> cotonete (a J&J brand, instead of "haste flexível")
polystyrene -> isopor (a Knauf brand, instead of "esferovite" or "poliestireno expandido")