10,258 karma · joined April 11, 2012
(I'm not the creator, but am friends with the creator who is 'Jarred on here)
Facebook also “doesn’t support” these sorts of links (at least to Telegram, Snapchat, others) on Instagram: https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/03/instagram-starts-blocking-...
It’s still a bit buggy and the UI needs a bit of polish, but I’ve been using it for the past year and it’s been helpful for thought and introspection.
there’s a beta here: https://posting.app
privacy policy here: https://posting.app/privacy
>While neither redirect you to an advertising company like TinyURL, Twitter’s primary business model is advertising, and bit.ly’s privacy policy says they share data with third parties to “…provide advertising products and services…”
Both services set long-lived tracking cookies:
curl -v 'http://bit.ly/aFzVh0'
...
< Location: http://nymag.com/daily/entertainment/2010/08/hear_katy_perrys_milk_milk_lem.html
< Set-Cookie: _bit=l03lLp-b899a3350a02095760-00P; Domain=bit.ly; Expires=Fri, 02 Jul 2021 21:47:25 GMT
curl -v 'https://t.co/45cMiYOHQ8'
...
< location: https://luke.cat/
< set-cookie: muc=6d0d0800-f738-4704-b292-f03b6e5a5f91; Max-Age=63072000; Expires=Tue, 03 Jan 2023 21:49:09 GMT; Domain=t.co; Secure; SameSite=NoneDefinitely smiled when the elephant gets up on its own feet again :)
Facebook knows my demographic because I provided it to them when I signed up and the types of content I interact with in their apps, and they have both coarse and granular location (IP address and the location permission) from their first party apps. Most relevant forms of targeting seem to still work. Ads from the local florist can still be targeted.
It's credible to me that other, Facebook specific, magic such as "lookalike audience" and other behavior cohorting tools may be impacted by this change, but I don't view this narrow issue of IDFA consent to be an absolute judgment on ad targeting.
This part hits the nail on the head. Facebook is intentionally being misleading in this campaign. I’ve had the IDFA turned off on my phone for years. Now apps have to ask for it individually. If apps have to prompt to access it, and this benefits small businesses so much, wouldn’t people agree to it with the right framing? Why doesn’t Facebook provide a method in its tracking SDKs that shows an interstitial about how this is good for small business before asking users if they want to be tracked?
Of course, Facebook would never do that. That’s because “informed consent” with adware doesn’t really exist... once people actually understand the scope of ad tracking networks... they don’t want it.
I’m not even against the concept of targeted advertising. Facebook’s first party properties are fine venues for it. I’m even (generally) ok with an advertiser retargeting me based on information they have about me. I wish that Facebook was prohibited from scooping up data in every other app I use and combining it with other data that they purchase. You can have targeted advertising without a massive surveillance dragnet.
> The magic of these pallets is the magic of abstraction. Take any object you like, pile it onto a pallet, and it becomes, simply, a “unit load”—standardized, cubical, and ideally suited to being scooped up by the tines of a forklift. This allows your Cheerios and your oysters to be whisked through the supply chain with great efficiency; the gains are so impressive, in fact, that many experts consider the pallet to be the most important materials-handling innovation of the twentieth century.
[0]: https://www.cabinetmagazine.org/issues/52/hodes.php
(The piece is far more interesting than the bit I quoted)
This is likely going to make a lot of conservatives in the US unhappy, since a number of elected officials in Congress (!) are openly questioning the election results. Also seems a lot more severe than Twitter’s approach, where Twitter is labeling “disputed claims” rather than taking them down.
I don’t believe that the 2020 US presidential election was rigged, but I think it’s heavy-handed to take these videos down outright. After the 2016 election, many people went wild with Russian conspiracy theories that proved to mostly be bogus, and that content never got this level of platform scrutiny or censorship.
This seems like exactly the sort of thing that open source could "disrupt". Something simple perhaps; a static site builder[0] that takes in candidates and a link to an ActBlue campaign and makes a passible "slate" page. One advantage to having something like this would be something that optimizes for all of the metadata/header tags that makes a page very sharable on social media.
Admittedly, software is probably not the hard or interesting part of doing this, as the post mentions, it's probably just the actual act of promotion. Then again, making "slates" easy to brand, spin up, and promote sounds like a powerful grass-roots tool to me. (If anyone is thinking about doing this, please email me)
[0]: I'm not suggesting some overengineered monstrosity. Hell, the static site builder could be a static HTML file of its own.
See: https://www.icij.org/investigations/fincen-files/, or Matt Taibbi's writeup of it: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/revenge-of-the-money-launderer...
I’d even be happy if more love was paid to “desktop light” environments. I have an iPad Pro that’s useless for software development without SSHing into a machine.