See: https://www.icij.org/investigations/fincen-files/, or Matt Taibbi's writeup of it: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/revenge-of-the-money-launderer...
See: https://www.icij.org/investigations/fincen-files/, or Matt Taibbi's writeup of it: https://taibbi.substack.com/p/revenge-of-the-money-launderer...
Its interesting that neither US nor Europe does see anything wrong with direct monetary sponsorship of politicians before elections (on top of lobbyists which are seem to be proper legal bribing middlemen)
random search: https://www.protiviti.com/US-en/insights/higher-stakes-casin...
>Examples of red flags include:
>• Customer transfers chips to other individuals to cash out
>• Customer redeems chips for casino checks that amount to significantly more than the amount of funds deposited with no apparent winnings to account for the additional amount
>• Customer departs casino without cashing out chips, an activity referred to as “chip walking.”
Now, obviously the tax authorities around the Globe are probably far more experienced than I am when it comes to things like this, and I don't think it's a coincidence that there's governmental resistance to cryptocurrencies; they authorities are busy trying to get rid of cash already, and cryptocurrencies are additional vectors allowing anonymous transactions.
1) Insert cash into slot machine. Play through the cash for a while, losing x%
2) Cash out (machine gives you a printed ticket to take to the casino desk). Now you have a paper trail showing that you won $ from a casino, giving the money a legitimate source.
The way to launder money is to have a casino, and then give the illicit cash to random folks and have them lose at the casino.
The most blatantly example I've seen was in Copenhagen, where small gambling dens with slot machines are pretty common. The weed dealers from Pusher Street spent an awful lot of their cash on gambling for some reason. ;)