dskloet

I got exactly that one as well so the possibility space is not that big?

The article mentions a photo of the setup ("see photo below"), but I don't see it.

That's why a level crossing has a barrier that's only there when a train is approaching. Imagine the barrier was always there; that would be asking for people to ignore it.

From the title I thought this was about some Uranium isotope.

I thought the contraceptive doesn't prevent the pregnancy but just causes the body to menstruate regardless. So she might have been pregnant many times but this time it wasn't terminated by mensuration? (I'm certainly not very confident in my understanding.)

There is no picking. The rich always get richer.

You can't have security without privacy.

Lighting doesn't work for large transactions, and isn't trustless for very small transactions. And lightning relies and being able to close channels so lighting security breaks when Bitcoin is congested.

Please learn dot ".". It repeats the last edit action. It's so powerful.

Your program is very close to the above commenter's program. You could have picked the identical program which is exactly what the proof does.

Yes it does.

It's Wordle but it hashes your guess before applying hints.

I guess I missed the second "as".

Swiping worked for me on Android.

> doesn't work as well as in Chrome

Did you mean Firefox there?

If you care about these people then presumably it does make you happier in the long term to let them know that you care about them. Especially if it's not that pleasant in the moment I imagine having a system to remind you could be helpful.

Why? Happiness and valuable shared experiences are also gains.

Why is it wrong to see a good friendship as very valuable?

72 = 2*2*2*3*3 so if the divisor is a multiple of those factors, the result is too. This makes the division quite easy in many cases. It's also why I immediately realized your typo in 72/4=19.

There is no difference between the customer paying extra and the seller paying extra. There is an amount the customer pays and an amount the seller receives, and the difference is what is paid extra.

Thanks for your answer. I agree making it difficult to unsubscribe is bad, but I honestly cannot imagine myself paying extra recurringly for saving myself 10 minutes once at the end. So it's interesting to see people making different trade-offs.

Just curious, would you pay 40% more for the convenience of being able to cancel in one place?

What requires mathematical reasoning? Getting or setting the nth bit? Or swapping two variables? What am I missing?

There's really no need for an 11 in the code. I'd say that makes the code worse, not better.

Is that a bad thing?

When did you listen? They used to be OK but then went completely down the conspiracy rabbit hole.

Then I don't think I understood your question. I agree the Copenhagen interpretation doesn't make sense, mostly because I listen to Sean Carroll's podcast.

You'll be convinced once you understand the EPR paradox and Bell's inequality. So look those up if you want to be convinced.

The assumption is that if you wouldn't be reading, you could do something else that you would want to do. But if you are reading you can't. If you have more time than you know what to do with, then the argument doesn't hold.

Aircon needs to get rid of its heat to work well. Trying to capture the energy from the temperature difference makes it cool less well.