Hacker News Reader

You'll be convinced once you understand the EPR paradox and Bell's inequality. So look those up if you want to be convinced.

View on HN

I did, and they make perfect sense if you look at them through the lens of MWI, which however seems weirdly unpopular in QM circles. I was taught the Copenhagen interpretation, which is just... madness.

Which interpretation seems to make the most sense depends a lot on the framing of the explanation, and not very much on the experiments themselves. This comment [1] really drove home the Copenhagen interpretation for me, I quote:

>It's painfully easy to have a clear intuitive picture of quantum physics. You just have to ditch one concept.

>Universe is not made of little balls.

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29756842

Then I don't think I understood your question. I agree the Copenhagen interpretation doesn't make sense, mostly because I listen to Sean Carroll's podcast.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com