88 karma · joined May 27, 2011
I suspect org-mode users are willing to go through an extra step if needed.
My notes are in .org if I want to share with someone else I export to .md and use the output
That kind of thing leaves a bad taste in some peoples mouth. I am pretty sure some people have bricked hardware with systemd.
The road to reality by Roger Penrose also has a treatment of Grassmann algebra in physics context.
I agree the library is likely a reference to the mathematician.
You see this kind of math in textbooks focused on computer graphics.
If you want a jumping off point, I wrote some simulations with this set of dice in python. The source [0] is on github.
The technique exists now [0]. It is kind of a pain to use and seems kind of dangerous to use as a web app. But it is there. I messed with this a few years ago.
[0] http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3111190/compiling-net-cod...
Also, although it is possible to extend C# using stuff like custom linq providers, [1] I still prefer lisp style macros.
[0] http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/2821 [1] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb546158.aspx
They have a simulator and some nice code samples. It is a fun C api and simulator. I am not sure when they will release the SDK for the Pebble.
(define-generic-mode 'critic-mode nil nil '(("{--.--}" . 'font-lock-warning-face) ("{~~.~~}" . 'font-lock-constant-face) ("{{.}}" . 'font-lock-keyword-face) ("{>>.<<}" . 'font-lock-function-name-face) ("{\+\+.*\+\+}" . 'font-lock-type-face) ) nil nil "A mode for foo files" )
Chocolatey seems to implement a subset of the functions that apt-get is useful for.
On Windows if I want to look for system updates, I use Windows update. On Debian I use apt-get.
On Windows if I want a library to use on a project, I use NuGet. On Debian I use apt-get.
On Windows if I want to install a bunch of free applications, I probably will use ninite, but chocolaty looks like a nice replacement for this. On Debian I use apt-get.
That said chocolatey seems like a nice tool for windows.
I am pretty sure I will be using Vim when Sublime goes the way of Textmate and SlickEdit.
At face value the article is saying. If most people are "ambiverts" and ambiverts make the best sales people, and sales people are the best leaders, why are there not more leaders? Why is it that most people are not in charge.
Finding out that there is no correlation between extroversion and sales performance is interesting and all but I think it would be better to find a new scale to use, one with positive correlation for what you are looking for.
Pointing out that people's scores for extroversion fall along a normal distribution, and that people's sales preform aces fall along a normal distribution does not really say much.
Typically, a low correlation score means your model is wrong, not that you need to fix your model by choosing a different locus.
Why insult something that someone obviously put a lot of care into?
The code is nicely formatted and clear. I can see how it works. Props to harthur for making something easy to read and then sharing it on Github. Both readable code and sharing should be encouraged.
I don't really get why someone would want to implement text processing utilities in node.js. It seems to be a bit heavy on the overhead.
Might someone re-implement harthur's user interface (which a bunch of people seem to like) in c, and submit it to the GNU Coreutils project?
When I Had a locked phone, I would keep it on Airplane mode for the duration of my trip.