294 karma · joined April 2, 2021
In real life lots of us have desks covered in papers and chaos - and that's ok too!
That said, while it worked it was absolutely awesome!
100% this! Checking the original source isn’t just a feature, for me it’s a requirement for the research I do. I need to pin cite a concept/case/regulation/etc. - and “chatGPT said” doesn’t cut it. So cool. Can’t wait to give this a try.
Any chance AI could be used to dedup the stories (like these are identical - only show higher source)?
Said Caveman 1 to Caveman 2 shortly after the discovery of fire. ;-)
Just happens to be this week’s 99% Invisible podcast is all about panopticon history!
I would think they would want to listen to it for the same reason they listen to human generated music.
Is your thought here that AI generated art is not art? Is it the nature of the creator that determines the listeners enjoyment? If the music generated by a computer is indistinguishable from human made music, how can this be possible? Moreover, at what point would the computer generation be sufficient to shift it from art to “screensaver”? Would it be one simulated member of an otherwise human orchestra? Would it take 50%. If you can’t draw a line, doesn’t that further indicate it’s irrelevant?
Edit: typos... because this wasn't written by AI...
I don’t disagree at all with your privacy concerns - but I disagree that it will be a problem. I think the population of people that care about not being on other people’s cameras enough to complain and make those people stop using their camera-laden devices is very, very small.
(Edited for typos)