2,035 karma · joined February 8, 2016
https://www.reuters.com/world/americas/oil-tanker-seized-by-...
The number of big trucks hanging out in the left lane in the US drives me mad...
Not such a terrible thing honestly...
Personally, I find the lack of predictability on US interstates is much riskier. I'm pretty sure the accident statistics back this up too.
Doesn't that depend on the state?
They indeed are for a very small subset of people, who are overrepresented on this website.
I really don't think you can generalize that wages o/a are incredible in the US.
of course, who's to say that next quarter priorities of management or shareholders shift & those "promises" evaporate?
Normally then you're able to get a "highly skilled migrant" permit (with less restrictive criteria than had you not studied in NL) which is renewable, then eventually after passing some language and integration tests and sufficient time you're eligible for long-term permanent residence (or even citizenship).
It's a refreshingly sane approach compared to the US.
It certainly doesn't - there are enough "cowboy" US operators who are working far below the quality and safety standards which are practiced by European contractors. It's really a struggle sometimes to ensure that things are done properly and safely in the US. It's a practically new industry in the US and there is a lot of catching up to do.
It obliges some pretty ridiculous transport and installation methodologies to construct wind farms that just don't exist anywhere else on the planet. This adds significant cost, complexity, and risk and makes US offshore wind farms more difficult and more expensive to build. So much hinges on contorded legal interpretations of what counts as a "coastwise point" and how that relates to "trade" between two of those points in the US.
In Europe, a specialized heavy lift crane ship or jack-up can sail into port and take on multiple foundations, transition pieces (the part between the foundation and turbine), or turbines and sail to the wind farm and install one after the other as fast as the weather permits. And to protect those foundations another specialized ship can come either before or after (or both) and place rock as efficient as possible. And a cable-lay vessel can come along and cut trenches and lay cable all with its own specialized subsea tooling. This is literal decades of development of best practice in terms of cost and efficiency.
In the US that's not possible.
The foreign heavy lift crane vessel can still do the lifting offshore - but, generally speaking, it can't go to port in the US and pick up anything to install offshore because, the US port is "coastwise point" A and the seabed offshore is point B and that counts as "coastwise transport." So that's where feeder barges come into play. The crane ship (or jack-up) sits offshore, more or less stationary (it's permitted to rotate, because that's technically not transport from point A to point B) and components are brought out by tug and barge. Not to mention the embarrasing physical state of & significant lack of fit-for-purpose cargo barges in the US...
The foreign cable lay vessel can still lay cable between two US points (there's an exception), but it can only make the trench to do so by "jetting" or "fluidizing" the soil because "cutting" or mechanically doing so would be dredging, and that's not allowed by any foreign vessels. If the soil conditions don't allow that, then a 2nd US-flagged vessel has to come. Huge cost increase, and again more complex, multi-stage operations.
The rock protection also gets a lot more complicated, depending whether it's US or non-US rock and depending on the foundation design needs to be installed before, or after, or both before & after the foundation itself is installed. It's a huge puzzle with potentially excessively expensive logistics.
All of this is possible & reality, but it's so much more complex, costly, and difficult. It's many more puzzle pieces to fit together accounting for tight supply chains, high weather risk & impact, and global competition where it's just a lot easier to do things elsewhere.
Sure, but that's utterly irrelevant to daily commuter / city bikes, which Van Moof are.
https://europa.eu/youreurope/business/dealing-with-customers...
This is complicated, and it’s insufficient just to state that everything in Europe is generally more expensive than in the US.
This is nothing to do with Netherlands’ own food self-sufficiency.
They quite literally did not make that claim.
It’s pretty frustrating and it used to happen quite infrequently.
For me at least, this wouldn’t really be a deciding factor among competing job offers.
That’s quite an uncharitable take, and plainly not what they meant to express.
I don’t think Denmark is the best example here. English competency is _extremely_ high and Danish is quite a difficult language to grasp (as far as I know as an A2/B1 Swedish learner).
Seconding this. It was quite a stark difference in university culture and expectations to me between US and NL.
The US can very well be home for someone born elsewhere. It would be wrong to assume that those people are somehow just temporarily staying.
I’d imagine the group of foreign-born people who are in the US on time-limited or otherwise precarious visas is a lot smaller.