corporalagumbo

But I wouldn't say Apple "reeks" of insecurity... We don't really have any knowledge about how much they have up their sleeves, and they've had a long time over the last half-decade to lay foundations for future maneuvers. Besides, if they can convince the everyman that they thought up modern design all by themselves, they could gain a massive advantage here.

I'm not implying that Apple can't make mistakes - it's clear they can with Maps and Siri - but a) it would be extremely uncharitable to judge them on version 1.0 of Maps and Siri, both ridiculously complex features, and most importantly b) their overall product strategy is still the best in the business. Doesn't matter how much people kick and scream about the newest Apple mistake - does anyone even remember Antennagate? Tech people cling to these memories, but normal people forgive and forget.

Instead Apple's competition has fallen over themselves to try and chase every short-term opportunity, leading to constant reinvention, total lack of focus, and squandered potential. Frankly, it's embarrassing - you would think that enough people outside of Apple recognise the scale of the challenge Apple poses and decide to respond. Instead these companies come off looking like cheap idiots.

That's exactly the point. It doesn't matter whether it's really hi-tech or unique or not. It's Apple's ability to present these things in a way which just makes you salivate that matters. This is a point which seems so hard for tech people to understand... it doesn't matter if you think people should see through Apple's claims, the spoils go to Apple because they know, as seemingly no other company on earth does, how to entrance people. A few key features, lavish, presentation, a feeling of luxury... that's what builds anticipation and excitement. Apple's closest equivalent are food companies, who have mastered the dramatic, salivatory description of products.

Whereas Apple focuses on a few core features to improve on and communicate with each phone, and they're overwhelmingly cautious - like only integrating Touch ID with a few spots of the phone at first. But they nail the initial execution, and the communication. So their phones are still the absolute centre of the market. And no other company can inspire product lust to the degree they can.

And I would wait til October for the new Paperwhite and probably the new Kobo Arc.

Also I would want to put about 10-20% away into some sort of investment fund unless there were some items that offered a serious short-term productivity increase the money could rather go to. Just a general rule.

Wait, what?

That said, this article is really a testament to the incredible potential of online education. A link was forged between a global centre of thought and a young boy in a far-flung, isolated and poor country. That's pretty awesome when you think about it, and hopefully something that will happen more and more as things get better!

Anyway, I hope you don't let stuff like this get you down. It's never too late in life to find your path.

Up until 2011 I was basically a upper-middle grade computer user. I owned a Macbook and used the trackpad heavily. The responsive gestures and seamless software experience were wonderful compared to Windows Vista. I knew a few keyboard shortcuts, and I'd jigged up a program so I could move between tabs on Firefox with finger swipes (among a few other gesture tricks) which I thought was very clever, but my computer skills didn't go much further - compared to the average user I was skilled though.

Then I injured my hand, and ever since I haven't been able to use a trackpad without my hand stiffening up and getting sore, which basically killed the entire experience. For a while I struggled along with my phone and iPad, until I wound up with some sort of nerve damage in my thumbs from a combination of rapid tapping on hard glass and haptic buzzing on my phone's softkeys. Nasty. Other ergonomic problems have mixed in with that - it amazes me that I could use desktop computers so effortlessly when I was a kid, now I get a stiff neck and my arms hurt from resting on the desk (working on getting a better desk...)

It's been an interesting experience, if at times extremely frustrating (as my appetite to consume information has only grown all throughout despite my deteriorating ability to use the most common computing forms.) Now I look around me and see what looks like a looming ergonomic disaster. I cringe now when I see people tapping away on hard, flat glass surfaces (not to mention all the hunched backs and pitched necks from laptop use - pretty breathtaking once you start looking for it). I wonder how widespread the ergonomic problems from hard/flat surface interactions are - seems like the kind of thing that could be simmering away behind the scenes (given that the worse you have this sort of problem, the harder it gets to remain socially active online, so it effectively silences you.) It seems like a bit of a perfect storm - there's just such a huge gap between the wider public and the media that serves them on the one hand, and people like HN users who actually know and are passionate about computers and usability on the other.

Me, I've been using Vim extensions and trying to make my laptop more keyboard-centric. Until eye-tracking and neural interfaces become available, the keyboard cannot be beaten for direct brain-to-action speed and control. My dream would be a computer environment that combines the beauty of modern touch and web interfaces with a unified universal modal keyboard control system, which reached into the browser. It would be nice if there was some standardisation of keyboard access for websites as well - Vim extensions are nice but limited, hard to fly with something that can't handle a Youtube video...

Anyway. I like to point out the difference between Apple's Magic Mouse and an ergonomic tool like the Handshoemouse. One looks beautiful but is a piece of shit interaction wise. The other looks bizarre but is actually built for a human hand. Unfortunately we're living in a world where the money is in serving the masses, people who for the most part will never understand how fast and powerful computers could be if they are moulded to suit our bodies, and so who think Apple products are perfect. Hopefully though as more people come up on these mass-market products and develop a taste for computing the demand will start to build for a higher grade of computer tools.

Ugh, I HATE this word. Why do people use it? To make themselves feel clever and superior?

I also notice a similar prejudice among commenters here. Come on people, this is basic economics.

Anyway, the key point is, as you say, they are (or seem to be) getting better. That is why I am optimistic.

What I am arguing instead (which you seem to have missed) is that consumer distaste for Windows 8 is an incredibly poor measure for the long-term rationality of Microsoft's business and product strategy. Because consumers are short-sighted and only care about whether a product is good today, not whether it is a transitional release laying the foundation to a competitive 201X ecosystem blah blah blah.

You might argue that the Windows team dropped the ball and didn't get enough right with this release. I would agree that they didn't get everything right, but long term I see the specific success of Windows 8 being of little consequence to the company - simply because future releases will continue to build on every aspect of Windows 8, as, out of the current Cambrian soup of a halfway OS, confused consumers and eclectic OEM devices, a new consensus about how computers should work is forged.