I hate doing performance reviews, and I especially didn't like when at a former employer I was asked to stack rank programmers. I feel like it's a task that's so difficult to get right, I can't even think of a wrong way to do it that's useful.
11,792 karma · joined February 20, 2007
Socials: - github.com/brlewis
--- Bruce Lewis, creator of https://en.howtruthful.com/
I hate doing performance reviews, and I especially didn't like when at a former employer I was asked to stack rank programmers. I feel like it's a task that's so difficult to get right, I can't even think of a wrong way to do it that's useful.
I don't know if you intended it this way, but the start of this comment makes it automatically flamebait.
Discussion around release announcements can quickly turn into a flame war. Please use caution.
So I've heard. Doesn't this mean that the UV news is of little impact?
Who's Rayleigh?
This work is an attempt to capture the “whole system costs” of an individual power plant. This could include the costs of enhancing the electricity network to connect a new power station, balancing supply and demand in real time, and providing backup power during periods of low wind or sun.
From the comment I'm replying to:
I wish proponents renewables were honest enough to not withhold these problems
As the article makes clear, nobody is hiding from the fact that there are costs associated with providing backup power during periods of low wind or sun.
The other problems in the comment are not problems with renewables per se (aside from one problem with the straw man "100% renewables"), but problems with German government policy.
>This is an extreme example (because it's so exceptionally pretty)
For a more pedestrian example, search for images of "letchworth state park upper falls". Note that photographers rarely try to crop out the railroad trestle even though it's much less pretty than everything else in the picture. It's an accepted part of the landscape and the aesthetic.
No, an inhalation valve makes 0.0% difference here. Here's a simple mental exercise to understand better. Imagine two people side by side. They are wearing identical masks, except one has an inhalation valve. They breathe in, pause, breathe out. In your mind, freeze the frame at the pause between breathing in and breathing out. At that moment, what's the difference between the two? Nothing. Now watch them breathe out. What's the difference? Still nothing.
> Where is this coming from that only a small amount of protection is provided to wearer [...] public health authorities
I clicked the HN link to your comments. I couldn't quickly find studies, just a mention of Korea having success with KN94 masks. I think it's safe to repost them now without being repetitive.
An inhalation valve preserves the mask's primary purpose by closing off during exhalation. It gives up a small amount of protection for the wearer, but obviously a lot of people aren't interested in that anyway and refuse to wear masks. With an inhalation valve they could at least protect others.
Why would it not be impacted? You'd be breathing in unfiltered air, and that's the main method of transmission.
It would be impacted. You'd lose 100% of that benefit. But 100% is still not much.
> anti-maskers threw enough of a fit about fairly comfortable ones
How's this for a solution? Make masks with inhalation valves. You can find masks for dusty work with exhalation valves. It wouldn't be too big a change to reverse those valves. The lost protection against inbound particles isn't much, and the gain would be near elimination of the inherent discomfort of re-breathing CO2. I'm not an anti-masker, but I notice I'm a lot more comfortable with my mask off.
Perhaps the core question is, "do billionaires owe a larger portion of their success to society at large than regular people do?"
My twitter client shows a reply from him yesterday, mentioning you, that points to an NPR link, which in turn cites this article: https://www.france24.com/en/20150808-france-wealthy-flee-hig...
Threads
* New variable 'main-thread' holds Emacs's main thread. This is handy in Lisp programs that run on a non-main thread and want to signal the main thread, e.g., when they encounter an error.
* 'thread-join' now returns the result of the finished thread.
* 'thread-signal' does not propagate errors to the main thread. Instead, error messages are just printed in the main thread.
* 'thread-alive-p' is now obsolete, use 'thread-live-p' instead.
* New command 'list-threads' shows Lisp threads. See the current list of live threads in a tabulated-list buffer which automatically updates. In the buffer, you can use 's q' or 's e' to signal a thread with quit or error respectively, or get a snapshot backtrace with 'b'.