Because you realize the Drs. are proxies for hospitals and err on the side of hospital stay despite quality of life balance.
They follow guardrails closely aligned with insurance and liability too. Unfortunately.
133 karma · joined September 17, 2014
They follow guardrails closely aligned with insurance and liability too. Unfortunately.
Some modern neighborhoods are trying living roofs with grass. Haven't taken off and the grass hasn't survived either.
Lastly, other day saw post about leaving grass uncut reduced surface temps notable amount.
Have a torn meniscus and given age is dumped into "excise meniscus tear" bucket. While Dr knows that shortens the path to knee replacement (which he no less pointed out on several occasions).
Going to Dr. Now seems like you are a walking revenue center vs. patient in need.
(ps. Many current accredited studies suggest repair attempt vs. removal)
Of course... The Drs pushed back and threatened to find alternative drugs and products if JnJ didn't relent from trying to get this tool in hospitals.
Suffice it to say.. we don't see any of them in hospitals.
I'm sure naming is related and glad to see the initiative.
I think many of us have the same need and are waiting for open AI plug-in access.
Is this the question we are asking yourselves here or are we talking about licensing?
The basics are pretty straight forward, but every vendor has stretched to include their key capabilities which makes the idea murky.
With this play, "funding secured" for his Twitter killer.
Unfortunately....not
This bill will grease the skids for a US crypto, similar to what China has already in service. People who quickly believe everything they hear will get excited, perhaps it is the $10 of “free” US crypto that is offered that helps adoption or the Venmo-like ease it is to send money to/fro. However, its very important to know - your money is will no longer act like it has in the past. It will now be more like “credits” which dynamically increase or decrease in value based on government whims. If the government wants to provide funding to stimulate the economy - magically trillions are distributed to everyone. Even more, they can make those funds disappear or expire if not used in a certain time. What’s worse, is that the notion of negative interest rates could be enacted to where your million dollar nest egg decays over time.
The gross inefficiencies of government coupled with their ability to wash away any misstep with trillions of dollars which we are paying for as a hidden tax via devaluation is what at issue and don’t see it going away soon. As I imagine the narrative will move to the USA crypto is the trusted and valid option and others are not secure, valid or even legal; I don’t think cryptos have much runway. The incentive for the US to control the money supply is too great. And if the US is one of the only two governments to warrant taxation of US citizens living abroad then you can be 100% certain they want to cover all their revenue leakage.
Until the US Government says to the contrary, Bitcoin and 100’s of other cryptocurrencies future are at risk. And if asking, is there any way to hedge against inflation? I think, metals are probably the answer. Gold, Copper, and even Uranium are all finite resources which similar to notion of BTC require “work” to mine and are done so on a global scale.
On top of that when you have a vision, roadmap, backlog what are you going to say other than, "yessir, I'll do more better" and will definitely help out more on the distractions or "quick-wins" as you like to refer to them.
In a matter of weeks l, it's clear who is moving the needle and think peer review would show this more than management alignment to OKRs.
On top of that it's what I use to trade. Hearing the feedback from my subscribers is my gold. https://mometic.com
A few points which hope to not conflict with pinned rules:
- Ethereum has outlived it's usefulness. Cost me several thousand dollars closing token positions last month. Swore off anything on this chain. People literally cannot move their $100 worth of alts because of the fees. (my kids, test coins, etc).
- Your statement about centralization is what made me move most of my interest to mobile crypto. One coin does mining on phones and sends their to/from via mobile. See this as the way for true-er decentralization. Still have app issues associated from Apple & Google. Further think new $600 reporting reg for Cashapp/PayPal will increase mobile p2p interest - for some reason
- I'm not a dev, but OP's points made me wonder about The Graph (GRT) and perhaps ATOM as ways to ensure data has an outlet in the case where something like Openseas gains too much power?
However, you maybe missed the message wars I, II, and III starting back in ~1997.
As an Android user and software dev, realize the biggest motivation would be to reduce friction across "borders".
The 2nd bone of contentiin is having 8 excited to pay and 2 whom do not. This goes back to the common denominator.
You must eliminate friction and while noble ideals, Telegram, Signal and others have a heck of a headstart even outside of iMessage.
As an idea...make it decentralized and autonomous. Think this is happening in a couple web3 projects, but building aessage framework that could live for 100yrs without updates would be interesting.
This topic will persevere.