Financiers bought up anesthesia practices, then raised prices
washingtonpost.com
washingtonpost.com
Like, I'll absolutely grant that it's not cheap to knock people out—my friend's father growing up was an anesthesiologist assistant and he made good money doing it, which is fair enough considering it's a job where you literally hold people's lives in your hands. I don't want the guy feeding me propofol to be an underpaid grunt.
But in addition to the already-too-high healthcare costs in this country (specifically the way that those costs get passed onto patients), it sucks getting a separate anesthesiologist bill on top of whatever you paid for the procedure that warranted going under in the first place. Especially when the cost of the initial procedure was insulting to begin with.
And I don't think it's solely a matter of outpatient surgery centers using third-party anesthesia techs. A few years back I was meant to get a bronchoscopy (basically a colonoscopy for your lungs) at a prestigious local hospital, but the anesthesiologist never showed up (and they weren't gonna put a tube down my trachea while I was awake, lol) so they had to send me home. Turns out there was a scheduling snafu and the anesthesiologist who was supposed to be there never got notified that they were on duty.
How does a hospital not have in-house anesthesiologists? Are they really cutting costs by scheduling medical technicians like they're picking up shifts at Taco Bell?
we really need to eliminate this absolutely ludicrous distinction legislatively.
EDIT: i stand corrected with regard to anesthesiologists. I maintain that hospitals and providers are quickly learning how to maneuver patients into scenarios where they will be subjected to surprise billing anyway. I also maintain that the concept of out-of-network services is mostly ridiculous, since the median patient is very rarely in a position to make actual choices about most of the care they receive.
https://www.cms.gov/files/document/faq-providers-no-surprise...
See top right of page 3 and the third paragraph of #7 on page 10.
Is there a concept of illegal agreement clauses in US? Where even after signing an agreement the signee can claim that such and such clause was illegal and if the court confirms it the whole agreement (or just the clause) is void?
Don’t work in healthcare, but if I were to venture a guess it’s around liability. If the patient is in a surgery and dies the anesthesiologist is probably one of the first to get blamed.
https://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/fund-reports/2...
Great, ain't it?
Of course... The Drs pushed back and threatened to find alternative drugs and products if JnJ didn't relent from trying to get this tool in hospitals.
Suffice it to say.. we don't see any of them in hospitals.
Duh.
Veterinarians, for example, have also gone through this process. Most people wouldn't expect that.
You won't get anti-trust enforcement until people start to realize that we need anti-trust enforcement. And the start of that is informing them.