[1] https://www.om.nl/onderwerpen/mh17-crash/@96068/jit-flight-m...
[2] https://www.om.nl/onderwerpen/mh17-vliegramp/presentaties/pr...
1,585 karma · joined May 12, 2014
[1] https://www.om.nl/onderwerpen/mh17-crash/@96068/jit-flight-m...
[2] https://www.om.nl/onderwerpen/mh17-vliegramp/presentaties/pr...
[1] http://airheadsfly.com/2014/07/15/ukraine-latest-an-26-downi...
[1] http://www.airspacemag.com/daily-planet/dutch-safety-board-u...
Switzerland is small but diverse. The states have significant freedom in making their laws. This usually works well, but sometimes leads to situations like this.
In 1994, a digital equivalent was born: A database called "ISIS". In 2010, a review showed that more than 230 000 people and organizations were registered once again. NDB, the federal intelligence service, collected data without checking if it is relevant. After a mandatory cleanup, this database is now said to only contain about 30 000 entities. The outcry was much smaller that time.
Now, my fellow citizens voted to be properly surveilled. And this time, we'll do it right and probably collect everything, including looking at any traffic flowing through Switzerland. That will be easy, since a recently passed law called "BÜPF" forces every swiss provider to retain metadata for six months, make realtime surveillance possible, decrypt data if they helped encrypt it and pay themselves for the necessary surveillance equipment (they will be reimbursed for every surveillance case).
I voted against it, but the writing was on the wall. Well-propagated irrational fear beats common sense. Maybe the checks and balances will be properly implemented this time, but I'm not counting on it.
Also, that's how media works these days. One press release to Reuters, and all the newspapers publish the same "facts".
That being said, I think it's fairly plausible that some actor with relations to Russia would publish documents like these.
Anyone with a credit card can sign up for Apple's developer program and start signing apps.
[1] http://www.welivesecurity.com/2016/08/30/osxkeydnap-spreads-...
http://www.springer.com/us/about-springer/company-informatio...
I'm really happy that Apple open-sourced Swift in this way. However, most of the ~400 pull requests are fixes for single typos. I hope that managing the GitHub issues won't become too much of a burden for the main developers (those with write access to the repository).
It's remarkably convenient and cheaper than owning a car if you don't drive that much. I can totally see this as the future – especially with self-driving vehicles.
It would be great if there was a system-wide, standardized way to do this in every app, but until an OS with this ability exists, we'll just have to do it ourselves.
For the company in question, security seems to be very important as shown by the fact that each computer sits on its own VLAN. Maybe they should consider using something like wireless tokens that lock the workstation if the token is too far away (e.g. http://www.gkchain.com).
I've also worked in companies where lots of doors require a key card, which also unlocks the computer (by means of a card reader at the workstation). So if you leave the room, you take the card with you anyway and the computer gets locked automatically.
On mobile, there are some SoCs that can do HEVC and VP9 decoding in 4K in hardware (like Nvidia's Tegra X1), but the large majority of smartphones does not yet have this capability. Encoding is a different story altogether. And iPhones will only do H.264 anyway for the foreseeable future.
I'm a strong proponent of open standards and I'm really looking forward to VP9 and HEVC, but it will be a while before they'll have good hardware acceleration on all platforms.
However, not mentioned is that a higher bitrate doesn't necessarily correlate with higher perceptual quality.
Additionally, part of H.264's appeal is its widespread hardware support, which enables features like smartphones with 4K video recording.
Yes, some things were better and easier then, but it wasn't all great.
In my opinion, most technological problems have been solved: Broadband is widely available, we have fairly good standards for HTML/CSS/JavaScript, reliance on plugins and stuff like ActiveX and Java is at an all time low. The question is now what we do with our newly-gained freedom – and as usual, this one is trickier than the technical stuff.
There have been several breaches in the last months where this was the main cause and it's something almost impossible to defend against – unless you're running your own datacenter hardware, which is very hard to get right.
Few providers properly secure their control panels with 2FA, even though these admin panels are an attractive target and almost always provide full access to the system.
I take that as a compliment. :)
While Apple did a remarkable job by making all the Cocoa stuff available in Swift, a lot of Swift's strength only shines when used with frameworks that are built for it.
magnet:?xt=urn:btih:77e1a18941186c1e6441721df91183d2a339d103&dn=Citizenfour+%28Edward+Snowden+story%2C+by+Laura+Poitras%29+%5B720p%2C+h264%5D+%5BIsohunt.to%5D&xl=3636600806&dl=3636600806&tr=udp://9.rarbg.com:2710/announce&tr=http://announce.torrentsmd.com:8080/announce.php