https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Alternative_Vot...
1,119 karma · joined November 22, 2013
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_Alternative_Vot...
thick red and amber carpet -
unit test results.
Slashdot discussion: https://entertainment.slashdot.org/story/04/05/07/138238/piz...
Archive of project homepage: https://web.archive.org/web/20040508090713/http://www.beiger...
As for the sys write: my current hypothesis is that .. there is a placeholder for an argument which is written to by the preceding dac .+4. ('"If a program can't rewrite its own code", he asked, "what good is it?"'). But I can't make sense of what it's actually putting there - I'd guess length, but it looks like ~(dir - 2) + 8.
open ..
loop
read a directory entry into tbuf
if we read 0 bytes (eof presumably), break loop
if tbuf[0] == '\0', go back to start of loop
append tbuf to dir
done
close ..
reopen .. with creat
write the stuff we built up into dir to ..
close ..
exit c1 = -8;
*9 = tbuf - 1;
do {
*(++(*8)) = *(++(*9));
} while(++c1 != 0);
goto 1b; // b for backwards?
It seems that memory locations 8-15 are auto-indexing[0], so the lac/dac i increments the pointed-at location before use, and isz is "increment and skip next instruction if zero".[0] PDP7 manual, big PDF: http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/dec/pdp7/F-75P_PDP7pr...
I think this is on the right track - it looks like the write call is to the newly created .., with df being used to hold the file descriptor.
They already did, or am I misunderstanding? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Curse_of_Monkey_Island
Developing new features is classed as "productive" or "R&D" or such, which means companies can claim some kind of tech subsidy or tax rebate on employees' wages for time spent doing it.
Maintenance tasks like fixing bugs and upgrading servers don't come under this classification, so they can't.
The incentives are thus set up for upper management to push against and actively neglect maintenance efforts.
Great story. I won't claim to be a wizard, but here's mine:
grep -Eo "mailto:[^\"']*" webpage.html | sed 's/^mailto://' | sort -u
The pattern means "mailto: and then everything up to a single or double quote", and the -o flag means "only show the matches". The main benefit of this approach is that it works even if you have multiple email addresses on a line.This is so controversial that some regions have propaganda music videos about it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O98qd7-dAaU
It looks like they're using the NOVA classifications[0]; there have been a couple of other articles relating to the same system posted here recently, e.g. [1].
The NutriSource in "Whole milk (Cloverland) with NutriSource fiber" is apparently 100% partially hydrolyzed guar gum[2], which I believe would qualify the combination as ultraprocessed under this part of the definition from [0]: "Substances only found in ultra-processed products include some directly extracted from foods, such as casein, lactose, whey, and gluten, and some derived from further processing of food constituents, such as hydrogenated or interesterified oils, hydrolysed proteins, soy protein isolate, maltodextrin, invert sugar and high fructose corn syrup.". By contrast, skim milk (as used in the unprocessed menu) has nothing added, only removed, and so would fall under their Group 1 "unprocessed or minimally processed foods".
As for whether this is actually a useful classification system, I don't know. I have no reason to believe any of the studies are bogus, but taken as a whole, it does seem like an attempt to launder the naturalistic fallacy into some scientific respectability.
[0] http://archive.wphna.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/WN-2016-...
[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=19930970
[2] https://www.nestlehealthscience.us/brands/nutrisource/nutris...
Regulation on additives includes sweeteners alongside colours, emulsifiers, etc: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32...
Regulation on flavourings excludes sweeteners: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32... (2. This Regulation shall not apply to: (a) substances which have exclusively a sweet, sour or salty taste;)
The Economist is putting it mildly. The Act is quite short and accessible, so well worth reading directly: https://www.hawley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2019-07/So.... More on that half an hour limit, from Section 4 (paraphrased):
- Opt-out 30 minutes a day time limit
- The time limit gets reset every month, so you have to keep opting out
- A nag pop-up at least once every 30 minutes showing how much time you've spent there that day
If this passes, using the (US) internet will become much more annoying.
(Section 7, which says the FTC gets to make up new rules later, looks a bit suspicious to me too, but I'm not clear on the degree to which that's just standard operating procedure for American politics.)
(Split panel view would be nice, while we're at it.)