284 karma · joined October 4, 2014
If you're a programmer you need to "portray" your programming skill.
I suspect the disconnect is a lot of people who say "eat food" really mean "drive a $60,000 car."
All it takes is 15 minute to look into the political history of the kids father and the nature of the clock that he "built" to realize something is amiss.
That's just outright untrue. Maybe you have good points somewhere else in your comment but saying such nonsense makes me less inclined to hear you out.
It doesn't help that most bookstore owners I have met (maybe half a dozen) are aggressively opinionated about what books are "worthy."
If you want to be righteous call the manager at the place you're ordering food from and complain, don't stiff the guy delivering pizza for a living.
If you often find yourself in conversations about "best simpsons vs downfall" you owe it to yourself to check out The Dead Homer's Society manifesto[0]. One of the author's greatest articles is on what he calls "zombie simpsons"[1].
Ultimately the discussion comes down to taste but Dead Homer's produces a very convincing argument behind his opinion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R160_(New_York_City_Subway_car...
Most professionals I know in the field take the attitude that a patient's psychological state should only be corrected if that patient feels they are an impediment to their own goals. This also goes along with the popular alcoholics anonymous mantra "we can't help you till you want to help yourself" (I'm not advocating AA just that it's a popular approach).
Of course this doesn't apply to people who have behavior disorders or are violent and end up committed.
The luck applies to those who are already doing everything right. The other people are "failures" because you can pinpoint where they were deficient. When I think about luck and success I picture a pool of highly educated, ambitious, type A people. Why does one of them become an industry tycoon billionaire while the others become merely wealthy? You can manufacture luck for the latter but not the former.
The bank isn't doing you any favors by letting you pay with money you don't have, they know they'll be getting that money back and then some.
I'm sure you could find plenty of traders on Wall Street with models of the market who would say "we don't understand and it doesn't matter" as the money flows into their account.
As far as drugs go benadryl is pretty innocuous. You could always buy that ZzzQuil stuff but it's the same thing for more money.
The game development section often has good programming related content as well.
I do hate the elitist aspect of travel though. In a way it's sort of like experimenting with drugs, you really can't have a say on the experience unless you've actually done it.
I've had to be very careful about who I talk to about my travels because I've noticed that even the kindest people can become apprehensive. They act like I'm questioning their knowledge/experience/worth if they are less well-traveled than me. If anyone has any tips for dealing with this please let me know. Note that I'm already very sensitive to the subject and never bring it up unless asked and even then keep the details to a minimum.
So as someone who has traveled around the world for many years let me give you permission to never leave home. The truth is wherever you go, there you are. As someone above mentioned, there is a very common cross section of interests regarding humans.
In my own subjective experience I now see travel as the physical equivalent of channel flipping. It's the replacing of any kind of real introspection or work with novelty. Novelty can be very useful but it can also be acquired for a fraction of the thousands of dollars necessary to travel.
Ask me how I know.
These cheap open box TR1200-DT3s regularly pop up on ebay, check out the completed listings.