969 karma · joined October 31, 2010
GMS lets you provide your own table and database implementations, so we use GMS to perform SQL queries against Grafana's dataframes - so users can join or manipulate different data source queires, but we don't have to insert the data into SQL to do this thanks to GMS.
Would be nice to remove that vauge clickbait part from the title
Got my attention more than than anything else. Seems to really be pushing antitrust to new heights?
"A standard protocol to encode Solana transaction requests within URLs to enable payments and other use cases"
"Now, he just needs somewhere to build it -- and $400 billion in funding"
The letter the county sends out http://www.miamidade.gov/permits/library/recertification-bui... says: "Failure to submit the required Recertification Report will result in the issuance of a Civil Violation Notice or ticket without further notice to you and referral of this matter to the Unsafe Structures Unit for the initiation of condemnation proceedings"
So to me this makes it seem like some government checks are in place. But curious if there were more recent government backed inspections for safety.
Adversarial Machine learning, or maybe dataset poisoning
However, it does now support queries like `host=*` with multiple alerts instances per host from one rule/query. E.g. https://github.com/grafana/grafana/issues/7832#issuecomment-...
So something like a variance of pitch per note measured at the end.
In particular, something like Bach's cello suites tend to highlight these sort of intonation issues.