But, yeah, having just gone through a round of interviews I think there's a big range of quality at work in these, and passed on some companies because of how irrelevant their prompts were or unstandardized their processes were.
1 karma · joined June 30, 2022
But, yeah, having just gone through a round of interviews I think there's a big range of quality at work in these, and passed on some companies because of how irrelevant their prompts were or unstandardized their processes were.
This is a growing source of spam for me personally and services I've worked on that have public email addresses (eg. support@), especially if near a mailing address. (Other services scrap lists of "local" businesses and sell them to the end users of the spam services.) Blocking gmail smtp is a non-starter due to popularity, graylisting doesn't help, and I haven't been able to find anywhere they take spam reports; search results are overwhelmed by discussion of reporting spam as a user of GMail.
(Context: I'm the lobsters admin.)
You can get help in #lobsters on Freenode. If you know Rails, deploying to Heroku is an afternoon job; using the provided ansible scripts on a bare VPS is a day or two.
10+ years of experience with Rails development, mostly helping startups launch as a consultant. I've spoken at RailsConf and several other conferences, and written a book on Ruby. I also have significant experience with devops automation, React, Python, and mentoring junior developers.
I have availability for part-time work and maintenance retainers. Not available for strict management roles or pager duty.
https://push.cx/consulting or peter@ that domain. I care most about understanding your business's goals and helping you achieve them, so please tell me about what you're working on. Thanks! :)
I knew Nix came before NixOS but was interested in both for the possibility of managing servers. I'd have made significantly less progress starting from Nix.
I can see how Guile would be an improvement over the Nix language, but have tapped out my patience on related topics for a while.
And that's on top of how much slower it is, how it starts with a sidebar covering the page, janky lightbox scrolling, fixed headers covering the page, autoplay everything, etc. Search and other major features don't work.
Traffic counting has to wait until I have spare attention, which is also a shallow resource pool. :)
The authors of this report are former employees of the Illinois Policy Institute: http://www.wirepoints.com/mark-glennon/ https://www.illinoispolicy.org/author/ilpoliski/
The Illinois Policy Institute is, politely, a conservative think tank: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Illinois_Policy_Institute
The full report plays a lot of games to produce these striking, misleading graphs, like comparing yearly numbers with total values of all future pension liabilities at face value instead of any attempt at NPV. If you're curious to spot more, the 1993 edition of How to Lie With Statistics chapter 7 ("The Semi-Attached Figure") and 9 ("How to Statisticulate") are a lighthearted read.
Support was useless. I was repeatedly asked if the IP address I gave them was public or private, when they should've had training or tooling to know at a glance. The help system closes tickets aggressively, ignores replies, and the link to keep a ticket open just leads to a knowledge base. Eventually support agreed to take a curl that reliably reproduces their bug, but I got no tracking number or even a vague promise they'd get back to me when it's fixed.
I concluded that if the product was broken and support was broken, there's probably something upstream in the business that's broken and I am not confident I'd be able to restore data.
Also, I don't believe he's kept his picture off Facebook. Unless he avoids all photographs, one of his friends has posted a photo, and another of his friends has tagged him. It doesn't matter how many times you ask people not to post/tag, Facebook has very aggressively marketed this as a normal thing to do. The tag step probably isn't even necessary if he's consistently one of the only people untagged in a group photo.
I look forward to GPDR enforcement and hope it can be used to delete even Facebook's shadow profiles.
And besides that, the National Labor Relations Board considers employees discussing pay to be protected concerted activity. I'm not sure if just having the rule is illegal, but enforcing it certainly is.
Could you share a link showing exponential increase in the use of EDGAR?
> According to Bureau of Labor Statistics, the average American works 8.8 hours every day. Yet a study of nearly 2,000 full-time office workers revealed that most people aren't working for most of the time they're at work.
The plain reading is that this article is based on BLS data. The BLS makes huge amounts of data available (and is friendly about answering questions), and the 8.8 hour figure is really theirs: https://www.bls.gov/tus/charts/chart1.pdf
But the second sentence is about unrelated research not conducted by the BLS, even if you trust that it exists.
This data looks bizarre. 23 minutes of smoke breaks? Only 15% of Americans smoke (https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/adul...), so if 85% of people spend 0 minutes a day smoking the other 15% spent 153 minutes per work day smoking. That can't be right, so this list must be the average time spent on an activity of all the people who reported engaging in it, which makes it pretty useless for understanding the overall situation it purports to talk about.
Assuming a study was done, this is probably self-reported data of a self-selected population. Ask 2,000 websurfers to break down their yesterday or last week of work and you're not going to get reliable data.
Without an accounting of methodology (or at least a citation), this article is an infohazard. People might read it an accidentally take it seriously, or remember these numbers but not remember they were completely unsupported.
Second point: "It adds a feature that's different from a similar language."
These are not persuasive arguments. I'm not trying to be unkind, but the first point is totally unsupported and the second doesn't elaborate on what's bad about classes besides that another language also has classes.
> If you imagine a component tree as a waterfall of props, each component’s state is like an additional water source that joins it at an arbitrary point but also flows down.
In this post’s example, I would expect to see a component for an individual Person with the props name and location, then a People component storing the ordered list in props. If the app does a lot of this general “maintain a sorted list with random insertions from over the net”, People would be wrapped by a higher-order component (https://facebook.github.io/react/docs/higher-order-component...) managing that. Otherwise there’d probably be a page-level custom component or just random stateful javascript pulling in the data and passing it down to People for rerendering. (I don’t know Redux to address the second half of his example.)
It’s ironic that the author advocates for immediate mode GUIs, because normal React looks and works like an immediate mode GUI with memoization. A component is a function responsible for part of the page. Its props are the input to the function and it returns a render of part of the page (possibly by rendering more memoized components). The cache is busted when props changes. There’s also a hack to be used sparingly called state so that small bits of UI state can be managed at a low-level instead of in their parent component.