6,113 karma · joined January 21, 2010
We already know what can go wrong.
We already did that decades and decades ago. Sugar, for example. Aside from so many foods being laced with it, you can now simply walk into a store and buy a kilogram of sugar and eat it. So many other examples. That ship sailed a long long time ago. All we can do now is nudge the dial the other way.
As for making the healthcare industry blush; the healthcare industry in the US is brutally uncommunist.
Did you really mean communist? If so, in what way is land planning in the US operated under principles of common ownership of the means of production, distribution and exchange.
Well here's something odd. Just yesterday I was in a city crossing it from one side to the other, and it was so much faster by underground train than it would have been in a car. Yet your statement suggests that that real experience couldn't be true.
Perhaps it's more accurate to say that public transport is SOMETIMES worse than a car. What do you think? Might that be more accurate?
Sounds like you very much do understand.
I understand a lot of people don't and this significantly increases the rate of vehicle collisions and other accidents.
"Software engineers often have an unjustified belief that they are intuitive experts in fields in which they have no training or experience."
Including, very frequently, understanding written text.
Then, once you've done that, recognise that what comes in will not match what you said and you can either have software that doesn't do what the users need and want it to do, or software that accepts input that doesn't quite match requirements.
Svalbard has a surprisingly large Thai population. I don't know about today, but at one point about ten percent of the population were Thai citizens.
Just because something is easy doesn't make it okay.
Would be nice but Amazon are quite keen on not letting that happen.
I apologise that none of the following words rhyme; rough, cough, plough, dough, lough, hiccough.
Is that so?
Yeah, could be. Plain white rice is a very cheap calorie sufficient diet. It's certainly cheaper than a healthy, nutritious diet.
But the point I'm going on to make isn't just about how stupid the cost of housing is; it's that the high cost of housing comes with extra costs that we might not even see.
How many people would be doing all sorts of neat things, some of which would genuinely bloom into real advances and ideas and genuine new wealth (by which I don't just mean an income; I mean the creation of wealth) if only they could afford some goddamn space in which to do it, without having to move so far from the existing life they have that pays the bills and keeps them alive and sane (by which I mean to suggest that not everyone has the luxury of moving to where there is cheaper space, if their job and support networks won't move too).
"You could say exactly the same thing about any form of encryption..."
That seems very untrue. I like my credit card details to be encrypted when I send them for the exact opposite of assisting cybercrime.
How about saying I have lots to hide.
I want to hide what I had for breakfast. I want to hide what book I'm reading. I want to hide what time I went to bed. I want to hide how many times I go to the gym each week. I have lots and lots to hide. I am not the property of the state and neither are my actions; I have lots to hide.
Yet here we are with sellers WANTING to sell their items at a lower price on places other than Amazon, but if they do, they'll go out of business. That doesn't sound pro-consumer.
I'm a consumer. I'd like to be able to buy items for the lowest price the seller wants to offer me. That's not happening in some cases because if they do, Amazon will exclude them and they'll go out of business. Yeah, definitely not pro-consumer. Pro-amazon, sure.