Thanks for pointing this out!
I should have said that Jugoslavia had different friends that most other European countries, and Serbia inherited some of those agreements.
704 karma · joined October 6, 2015
I should have said that Jugoslavia had different friends that most other European countries, and Serbia inherited some of those agreements.
That’s due to agreements between non-aligned counties signed by Jugoslavia that Serbia inherited.
You cannot still enter those countries without a visa with an EU passport, thus making a Serbian passport quite advantageous if you are a EU citizen.
Overexaggeration is not a word, you are overexaggerating... oops... exaggerating.
How does this compare with the reference encoder?
As far as I remember GMail can send emails on behalf of another address you own:
https://support.google.com/mail/answer/22370?hl=en
This way VC Mike will have a seamless experience writing you to your @foo.com address.
Google Maps are slightly more detailed, probably since Google is generating the maps automatically from satellite imagery, but for going to one point of the city to another I feel that the two apps are essentially equivalent!
Cosmological data show that there should be only three generations of matter.
Thanks!
And I cannot really see how a blockchain could have prevented it... I would be interested in hearing ideas about this!
That’s how the banking system has worked for centuries.
The use case for a blockchain is narrower: it can be used to establish trust between two parties in absence of a trustable third party.
Following you argument, whether you like it or not, people will commit homicide. Let’s regulate it!
It’s what works in the academia, where anyone can get aribitrarily close to a 4.0/4.0 GPA, if the grades are inflated enough, but clearly only 10% of students can fit in the top 10% of the class, making this latter rating much more significant.
Simple example (I am sure there are better ways of doing so) after ten Uber rides you are given five stars, and you can distribute that to the drivers you liked the most.
Should we stop using a feature because some buggy apps don’t support it?
Could you please elaborate on this?
I know that in principle Rust is safer, but I am wondering it makes sense to re-implement code so heavily audited as libc.
Wouldn’t it be better to redirect the effort to some other less audited code?
It depends on how rigorous you want the treatment to be.
The whole machinery of Feynman diagrams is derived from Path Integrals and Wick's Theorem, so they are rigorous, at least as rigorous as standard perturbation theory using operatorial quantum mechanics.
A mathematical physicist won't be amused, though, that's correct. But I wouldn't say that Path Integrals are less rigorous than the average technique used in Theoretical Physics, and particularly in many-body theory.