118 karma · joined September 23, 2013
I was hoping their pricing would undercut some of their competition - doesn't seem like I would save much if I moved from Cloudinary, for example. But definitely something I'll consider on future projects.
I do appreciate this pricing model vs. others like Cloudinary that penalise you for creating more variations. Trying to serve the best image sizes/formats per device is best for the user experience.
Semi-related; I'd like to see Cloudflare improve their CDN performance in the Oceania region.
I look forward to seeing what the pricing is, it's disappointing they didn't announce it here. I feel like they've tried to obscure the pricing for Image Resizing, and only made it available to Business customers.
Would love to see Cloudflare be more upfront with the pricing around their image products, and make them available to Free/Pro customers as well.
I appreciate that their Twitter account is looking into it, but feel like this should be a pretty quick fix. I'm hesitant to even log into my Backblaze account again until it's sorted.
It's boring having different Rubocop settings and having people argue over new rules. I have preferences too, but I'd rather get on with my life. I can just write code, and have Standard make it standard and consistent across all projects.
It would be nicer if Ruby did this itself (Crystal does, and that's fantastic) but this is the next best thing. Having one attempted standard is better than no standards at all.
(My only quibble is the name makes it sound related to the Standard JS project when it doesn't).
However, there seemed to be some confusion about whether the language could continue with inferred types or whether you'd need to annotate yourself - and what that would mean for compile speeds. I'm hoping those concerns can be resolved
Laravel 5.4 shipped a month ago with browser integration testing and Webpack by default, now Rails has the same.