153 karma · joined September 6, 2013
1. Sleek design (Pebble Time Steel looks better) 2. Innovating new markets/ideas (the new bands are doing to open the flood gates for hardware devs) 3. Keeping it simple (Apple watch wants to put a smartphone on your wrist, Pebble focuses on what watches do best)
Pebble is the leader in this way of thinking. They are showing more innovation than Apple with the announcement of the smartbands. Opening up a world of possibilities for software and hardware engineers/ideas
We're using the Pebble to track seizures through the accelerometer (neutun.com).
With these new bands, and the amazing battery life, we could have multiple device and signal support, allowing us to branch out to other types of seizures and conditions.
Mainly centering around high potential technology, overlooked ideas and opportunities that these startups can take advantage of.
My question becomes, and it seems PGs, how can you do this without the value of hindsight. One one hand, you could sit and reason why startup x or your startup idea is the Microsoft in this scenario. But you can also easily delude yourself.
Pebble, IMO, is shaping up alot like early Apple did. They are entering a competitive industry with a new product, facing a goliath and have a huge emphasis on their design & focus on developer. Which makes me believe history will repeat itself. That if we have the Apple for wearables, there should be, or soon, a Microsoft for wearables.
Just a thought, would love any point for/against.
For reference:
http://paulgraham.com/ambitious.html https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9ITLdmfdLI
Would you see anything else of value?
But we will update soon that might help! (another hardware platform wants to contribute)