[0] https://www.leidenmedievalistsblog.nl/tags/medieval%20pigs
929 karma · joined July 22, 2018
[0] https://www.leidenmedievalistsblog.nl/tags/medieval%20pigs
All the comments in this thread are replies to someone who seems to do exactly that by defending farmers "visiting politicians their homes with torches, threatening them and explicitly their kids, blockading highways with burning rubble, blocking highways with asbestos, using their tractors to rip out doors out of government buildings." by saying "I mean placing the blame for climate change on the backs of Dutch farmers was absurd."
[0] Well, they didn't really want it, but had to https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/apr/24/dutch-official...
That’s not how PlayStore permissions work. You have to target a certain Android version to release update apps and that version dictates how permissions work. You can’t get around those requirements by using an old framework.
The only problem is that you can use extension in CommonMark. So although GitHub and my note taking app both use CommonMark, they might not support exactly the same features.
Only if you take really specific statements and turn them into a general theory. But this discussion isn't about theoretical thefts and deathbeds, it's one about the reality that Musk is buying Twitter[0]. There is no "army of lawyers that Twitter shareholders had to pay for", because the current shareholders won't have to pay anything. Twitter is paying for the lawyers and Musk will and up owning Twitter. That's not some moral judgement, it's a description of the facts. Nothing I've said so far is in defense of what Musk does.
To be clear: I behavior is justifiable. He created this mess by making really dumb decisions and then trying everything to get out of this situation by not caring about anything or anyone but himself. It has been a huge waste of time and money. But as it turns out, Musk will be the one owning a company he doesn't want, and as that owner he'll be the one paying for that wasted time and for the costs made by both parties of the lawsuit. It just seems that the person that's by far the most hurt by Musks actions is Musk himself.
[0]In this entire comment I'm assuming the deal actually goes through.
> You don’t think anyone was hurt by the absolutely enormous amount of stress he chose to create?
Fair point, I imagine the last couple of months have not been great for many Twitter-employees.
> Or the army of lawyers that Twitter shareholders had to pay for?
As far as I know the shareholders don't directly pay for the lawyers, that money comes from some financial reserve Twitter has. In normal circumstances massive legal costs can reduce the value of a company, but in this case the shareholders will be able to sell each share for the same $54.20 as before the lawsuit. If the company becomes less valuable because of this, that's the problem of the next owner of the company. Since Musk will end up owning Twitter, he'll end up paying for the lawyers on both sides of this suit. Or am I missing something?
If that harm is reflected in something else (the reputation of Twitter maybe?) that is damage Musk did to his own company.
So maybe whoever co-invested with Musk got hurt a bit, but they’ll still get whatever part of Twitter they wanted, for the price they agreed on.
And I don't think that option is as good as IDCAC (or Consent-O-Matic [0]) + CookieAutoDelete. With those two add-ons even first party cookies are deleted, while you don't need to close banners all the time.
[0] https://github.com/OhMyGuus/I-Dont-Care-About-Cookies/issues...
And besides that, I think it's really naive to assume you've got any influence on tracking that sites do on their site. With cookies I know I can choose to save them on my machine or not. If a website uses the fingerprint of my computer to identify me, they'll almost certainly keep doing that after I've rejected their cookies.
So I went for a solution that makes browsing less annoying, whithout storing many cookies:
- Have this add on accept all cookies - Block third party cookies - Delete cookies from websites as soon as I close a tab
I (and you) don't know if many users of this add on do something similar, but it is what's recommended on the website
> Please educate yourself about cookie related privacy issues and ways to protect yourself and your data. For example, you can block 3rd party cookies, install ad blocking extensions and then block tracking tools, delete browsing data regularly, enable Tracking Protection in your browser etc.
iPhones could scan them with the default camera app, but on Android it really depended on the manufacturer.
So you couldn't just say: "point your camera app at the code and open the url that appears.", which made using QR codes pretty much useless unless you had an app where you could build in an scanner for these codes.
I listen to Discover Weekly every week (I think I've missed 1 week in several years). Every time I like a song, want to hear the rest of the album it's on or want to hear more of that artist, I add that song to a big playlist (currently 906 songs) so I can open that artist's page later. On that artist page I often check out the 'appears on' section to check out albums or playlists with similar music. I treat that album/playlist the same as Discover weekly: If I like a song I add it to the big playlist.
I think this works great, I often discover new artists or songs, all more or less in the same (electronicy) genres though. I've also noticed that I can listen to some albums that are different, but it won't get added to my Discover Weekly, which is exactly how I like it. For example: sometimes I like to listen to the Red Hot Chili Peppers for an afternoon, but I don't feel the need to have similar artists added to my mix of songs.
I don't really use the Daily mixes. Every one of those seems to have the same couple of artist and the mix of artists doen't really changes over time.
And sometimes a friend of mine or some family members send me a link to an album or playlist they like.
---
Are paywalls ok?
It's ok to post stories from sites with paywalls that have workarounds.
In comments, it's ok to ask how to read an article and to help other users do so. But please don't post complaints about paywalls. Those are off topic. More here.
---
I've used temperatures in the 60 something to 80 something range to measure the inside of food, my oven goes anywhere from 160 to 220 degrees, but water boils when it goes all bubbly. I know that that's at 100 degrees, but I don't do anything with that info.
I don't agree with bmitc's point that Fahrenheit feels more natural. But it seems like that anytime someone has something positive to say about Fahrenheit or imperial measurement, 10 different people need to tell them how wrong they are, and how there can't be anything positive about those systems of measurement. That doesn't seem necessary to me. Especially with temperatures where everyone just remembers a couple of numbers and associates them to a certain feeling or application, and whatever you've used your entire life will feel better or more natural.
bmitc reacted to the comment that said "Temperature near 100°C is important when we cook (eggs, pasta, rice)." By asking when that info is important. They are not the one here that put weight in arbitrary numbers, at least in that last comment.
> Today, consumers can choose trusted curation and full integration (iDevices), or non-curated and unbundled (countless brand + Android OS options).
Or option 3: curated and integrated by buying an Android phone that comes bundled with all kinds of Google applications.