316 karma · joined August 5, 2011
Last year my daughter got bit so badly that both of her legs looked like she had a huge rash. It was just a string of mosquito bites combined with a sensitivity to them that exaggerated an already rough problem.
All that said, I'm not sure I'm pro-extermination. We have a lot of bats that come around and eat the mosquitos around dusk. I'm sure they'd find other things to eat, but I like seeing them skim the pool for a drink and then eat a few dozen skeeters while they dart around. I also don't like people playing god with this type of stuff. The butterfly effect is real, and if we exterminate them all, we won't know what the effect is until it's already too late. Realistically, the earth adapts to whatever we do to it. Long after we're gone, there will be tons of interesting life forms. That still doesn't make me any less uneasy about it.
I don't know.
Why would you treat working from home any differently than working from the office? I wouldn't work until 8pm in the office, so why would I do it at home?
The special scheduling of personal appointments doesn't make sense to me. If you were in the office, you'd tell people "I'll be away from 1-2 today" and that's it. I do the same thing when I'm working from home.
Maybe I'm weird because I'm not big on socially hanging with my coworkers, but the face time doesn't bother me at all. We do a lot of video calls, I see them plenty.
My work is not my life. I've never had trouble separating work and home life. Working from a room in my house has never changed that. Now if you'll excuse me, I have some yard work to do on my lunch break.
I don't care about the community aspect of it, but I worked at a corporation that did care about those graphs when they're completely meaningless. When your bonus depends on how many commits you make, why not commit once per line?
I can't afford to go out on a limb for a startup or to hope for some big pay day. I'm a single earner in a family of five and I can't just make my kids stop eating and growing because I want to get some stock options.
I would suggest anyone thinking of working at a startup keeps their regular salary in mind as what you need/want, and think of stock as a bonus later that probably will NOT ever come.
Stock is a nice carrot to dangle if you're a stingy employer (or one who refuses to pay folks' worth), but it shouldn't be considered as part of your compensation if you're a lowly employee like myself.
I still work for a NYC-based company, I just work remotely from Richmond, VA. I like it better this way. I may not always work for a NYC co, but I will stay here. I bought a house last year that would be well into the millions in NYC's commutable suburbs. My kids go to just as good of a school as they did in NJ. There is no traffic to speak of.
If you have a dream of being in one of those cities, one of those scenes, then by all means, go for it. It's just not for me (and from what I can see, a lot of other folks on here).
On the other hand, you can have completely documented, easy to read, well thought-out code that has a terrible UI that no one will bother using. I guess you can say the software is "quality," but it doesn't matter.
Then again, maybe "quality" software to you is software that works, like the first example. In that case, it doesn't matter how well documented it is. It works. It's self-readable at least to those who wrote it. Maybe the team will never grow beyond that, so who cares? Or by the time it does, it will be rewritten anyway for other reasons.
The point, I think, the author is trying to make is that quality means so many things it means nothing. It's a useless term because it has no objective meaning. We can argue about what you think quality is and what I think it is, but it's likely going to be different for any two people.
There are a lot of ideas you may find silly but others find interesting enough to spend their working hours to make a success. If you only focus on finances, tons of them will fail. If you look at the experience they'll have doing it, I'm sure some of them will find it was a success.
I've worked at a couple startups and I've worked at some big corporations. There are bad coders everywhere. There are bad ideas everywhere. There are also a lot of jealous people who apparently get bent out of shape because people who are not the best engineer ever are making more money than them and getting to take time off arbitrarily.
Instead of focusing on how much you think their startup is stupid, or how they shouldn't get time off because they're not as good as you (based on who knows what), why not just focus on what you have, what you do, and what you like? Stop living against them and live for yourself.
It's unfortunate, because I thought WP8 was awesome. Definitely my favorite experience of any mobile OS.
Why would a phone 6-7x the price be roughly equivalent in experience? Why should it be? The 640 isn't subsidized by anything. $99 is the just the price of it. It's an amazing device, FAR better than an equivalent android.
People complain about Windows Phone not having "flagship" devices, but realistically, it doesn't need them. The cheap phones are great.
I've tried expensive android phones, iphone, as well. None of them stand up to the experience on WP for me. If Microsoft keeps making $100 phones like this, I'll never pay more than that for a phone.
I don't really care where anyone went to school. It doesn't mean anything. Really, going to school at all doesn't mean much. I need to see what you've done outside of that to make any meaningful evaluation. It doesn't matter if it's a huge project. You can give me a couple 10-line things that do something useful and I'll still get to see how you name things, format code, use built-in libraries, etc. Then we can chit chat about project management and how much you love or hate it.
Pop music is stupid because it's catchy. It's always been that way, always will be.
By cyclical, I meant the "cool" factor of companies. I'm sure many people here remember when Apple was a total joke after being awesome. Microsoft is coming out of their "joke" phase, IMO.
IMO, Microsoft's "uncool" image is the only thing holding it back. Like everything else, it's cyclical. They'll be back on top, and I think Windows 10 is going to start getting people back on board.