vvG94KbDUtRa

Calling Gab pro free speech is pretty rich. They ban people for being Democrats or being critical of gab itself. They just don't ban people for anti semitism.

No the point of the article is they didn't hold them in the same esteem as Harvard and Stanford. Which seems...fine?

GDPR is an absolute disaster which has already stifled innovation and entrenched incumbents

that would incredibly regressive. it's an awful idea

That's like the most obvious thing in the world to catch and TT definitely checks for it. So this seems weird

retail investors are a very small minority of short positions. hedge funds do most of the shorting in the market

> You can measure conversions without relying on personally identifiable information. Adding e.g. a non-personal tag to your URL will enable you to track the source of a conversion

That literally is what we're talking about

apple is leaning into services and advertising heavily right this instant

so you were a total dick to a random person and you're writing this story like you're the hero?

I mean try using a smartphone with a banned apple or google account. A PS5 is a brick if sony bans your account. This is standard industry practice

on the contrary, these things can roam up to 5 miles from their nests

There's a lot of things you can "both sides" but only one side is undermining democracy because their positions are unpopular.

Where would anyone get the idea that a columnist shouldn't criticize other writers at a paper? Everyone who works there is supposed to have the same ideas about everything?

So glad you mentioned this I haven't seen anyone else talk about it. I quit playing this game because I couldn't sleep afterward. So weird nothing else has ever affected me like that

I really don't understand the idea that take home is somehow more fair or accurate than whiteboards. I've judged and taken both whiteboards and take homes. Take homes are more annoying for the candidate, and in my experience much more subjective from the interviewer. In my experience take home is the absolute worst way to pick a candidate.

There are ways. Lots of podcasts etc are RSS and behind paywalls. Agree we should make it easier and companies are starting to pop up that empower and enable the distributed internet rather than destroying it, even as spotify is making major moves in the other direction.

This quote is awesome thanks for sharing

ugh why is ipv6 impossible to understand :/

Also increasingly apple is moving to compete in services. Every incentive in the world will be to adopt the practices the other guys do. Putting your trust in apple right now on the privacy issue seems pretty misguided.

I don't agree with you, but even if I did, the "pretense" being referred to is "we don't actually want violence inflicted on the other party". I'd say that's a pretty important pretense to keep

I have to doubt this is a primary factor. If it were then developers would make more single players games, but everyone wants to make online games with microtransactions

remove the headphone jack of course

Spoken like someone who has never tried to optimize startup time. If network is your blocker, you need to do it as soon as possible

They're nonsensical. There's no legal definition of journalist. You don't get a license from the government

It's an earnings call. He put it in the terms his audience expected. Nobody made any deal out of it except one HN commenter. So I think it's okay

Ummm it's also strictly better for apple. They do get to know every time you sign in, instead of another company getting that. It's certainly not better for users than creating a separate account tied to a separate email for every service without a big company in between.

Apple is marketing privacy while storing encryption keys in China and becoming a services business. The more their revenue shifts away from hardware the more they'll be compelled to collect data to improve their services. There's no way around this.

Android trivially gives you all the apps on a phone just by asking

Only the government can violate the 4th amendment