(saves this HN post to Pocket to come back to it later to see replies)
618 karma · joined April 7, 2011
(saves this HN post to Pocket to come back to it later to see replies)
I haven't tried again to see if newer versions have fixed the issue.
Also, with a rewrite I've hoped that remote development will be less buggy than it currently is with Goland. It's laggy too and you see weird screen flashes. Sometimes certain features don't even work over remote.
Developer "snow day".
Who even reads these articles? Does anyone get benefits?
Otherwise, I stay calm on roads and never try to overreact to the overly aggressive people driving around me. I also never take too aggressive lane change because I worry someone might have road rage.
Sorry to hear and I hope you recovered fully.
Fundamentally, our roads are unsafe and since the pandemic road deaths in the US have been on the rise. Locally where I live in, SF, the number of driving citations is significantly down over the last 10 years. I see incredibly risky maneuvers when I'm driving my car or on bike.
Many levels of gov are not addressing this serious risk to our health, road accidents. If our roads were declared a public health hazard and be avoided at all costs it might be draw some attention where we move towards finding solutions.
One follow up is there are instances where Datadog report outages but Metrist says it's green.
Is that because the functional tests are still working but some other part of Datadog was reported as down?
Anyone from Metrist able to explain this?
I'd say that's a win. We should be preserving as much as we can which really means most of us shouldn't be exploring more of the park which is mostly off trail.
I do get your point that people are coming to Yosemite and are not even taking advantage of the trails.
One point that should be made from this is that many people who are coming to the park don't really have the fitness, skills, and motivation to explore more of the trails in the park. Similarly, many people really aren't going to go explore at their companies because of skills, motivation, and time. Time is a major blocker for me because I can do more in areas outside of my focus but there are other life obligations and the need to rest to avoid burnout.
We already have a social credit score and it's privatized now. It's background checks.
From the story:
> While she does not have a criminal record, her boyfriend does, she said, telling Motherboard it was “a white collar charge,” though she did not go into specifics.
I find it a bit odd to let private companies do background checks when this really seems more of a function of government where as a society we can have input and reform the process.
https://community.logmein.com/t5/LastPass-Support-Discussion...
From another perspective living in the US I'm pretty grateful that the power is super stable because so many things I rely on need power and they almost always work. In India it's common to have rolling blackouts so people are quite adapted to outages daily.
What's really nice if you run the migrations once to setup the tests then subsequent tests can be fast. Each test run within a nested transaction and rolled back at the end. This ensures that each test get a clean DB to work off of with incurring the cost of running all the migrations.
Template errors have gotten better but can get very verbose. I rarely read the whole thing. You learn how to skim and find where I can click to get to the line which has the issue.
PG will say it's doing a hash look up and you'd think it'd be fast but it will take quite sometime relative to joining two large tables with integer IDs. With UUIDS PG will give up doing a hash look up sometimes and try to do table scans unless you adjust random_page_cost.
In general joining on UUIDs for large tables is a bad idea. It can be great if you are joining a single row to another row.
Also, templating is incredibly powerful. I avoid copy / paste in favor of typing or generating things out. Copy/Paste is a really bad pattern and the overhead of having to put the code in makes me think about abstracting it much earlier than if I just copied and pasting things.
Making code changes means one takes on the risk of breaking things. I think the people who don't break stuff are the ones who continue to refactor. The ones who don't either are scared of breaking stuff or had a bad experience with breaking stuff.
I suspect the people who refactor have what can be describe as perfectionism or obsessive compulsive.
I'm in that bucket. I can see certain code which is too complex or didn't handle a requirement well and I want to get it to be stated more simply.
That's actually good and a bit surprising. I find it quite disingenuous that DoorDash lists restaurants that haven't agreed to do take-out or delivery. Not only that by having a call center call into a restaurant it's just making the experience more expensive.
There is one restaurant in SF that was going to push for legal action. https://www.eater.com/2020/1/29/21113416/grubhub-seamless-ki...
The longer term impact is going to be the lack of funding in the coming couple of years and lack of customers for the services/products coming out of startups.
How will VC funds fair in this? Are there enough LPs out there willing to put their money into this risk pool?
I hope that eat at restaurants will have a renaissance. It's nice to eat out, be in a different space than your home, etc...
Only option to get that is to use the built in smart features of the TV. So even using external boxes you don't get all the latest hardware support for video codecs.
Another option connect it to a dedicated subnet which cannot route to the internet or another device.