Medusa is a device that allows connecting of old computers to modern displays
medusa-sc.org
medusa-sc.org
There have always been adapters and multi-adapters because of hand-held video recorders, various entertainment units, and even overhead displays. Even HDMI comes in Standard, Dual, Mini, Micro and a specialized Automotive connectors.
For someone with a lot of retro gear mixed in with new gear (like me), it's probably not such a bad price. Especially businesses that digitize home videos etc.
I wonder if there is surge control on the inputs. The number one reason I have to replace video adapters is the input buffer frying. Ironically that often results in a not-blue screen of death.
[0] Don't ask me how much. I imagine you probably couldn't directly sample analog video on an FPGA.
You'd be petrified to see it.
* Font height changed to 2 pixels, so 100 lines of "text" instead of 25 (640×200 actual pixels).
[1] https://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~rwest/wikispeedia/wpcd/wp/c/Color_...
Not a total loss, CGA was also also popular in cabinet arcade games. You can get converter boards. All the ones I've seen had 5-pin headers and you have to build your own cable.
It seems like an attempt to snip the OSSC Pro, an open source hardware (OSHW) solution which is set to release soon.
lvds to displayport converter is interesting and I should look into it. Thanks for mentioning.
Modern displays are ridiculously more power efficient.
From the ad copy of a Dell U2720Q 4K 27":
> Exceptional color: Get wide color coverage with 95% DCI-P3 – which covers approximately 25% more color space than sRGB – for true color reproduction. This monitor also offers 99% sRGB and 99% Rec 709 color coverage.
> Outstanding color depth: With and outstanding color depth of 1.07 billion colors (that’s 64 times more color depth than standard monitors), excellent peak brightness and a high contrast ratio of 1300:1, images are displayed in true-to-life color with clear details even in dark shadows or brightly lit areas. Be prepared for better color gradation and precision in more shades on this VESA DisplayHDR™ 400 monitor.
> True-to-life details: 4K UHD (3840 X 2160) resolution with a high pixel density of 163ppi gives you four times more details than Full HD.
> Accurate color, out of the box: Your monitor is factory calibrated at 99% sRGB to an accuracy of Delta-E less than 2 for accurate colors right from the start.
- Better color gamut - 178 degree viewing angle - Brighter panel - Anti-glare coated
Even if you don't get 10-bit you'll get more accurate colors because the deltaE value is lower. And since you panel is 10 years old panel uniformity will certainly be much better.
I bought 2 used 4K Dell U2718Q displays (the older model) for 250 each. The best displays I have ever used. Very worth it. I recommend you demo 1 if you can.
That's a 16:9 display and you won't get the same real estate. I'm using my monitor at its native 2560x1600 at 100% scaling. 3840x2160 at either 27" or 32" (I've tried both) is unusably small at 100% and only a scant 2560x1440 at 150% scaling. The difference from 1600p to 1440p is rather stark and very hard to swallow.
As a sidenote - why is a converter for eDP needed in the first place, other than to supply power for the backlight, and to adapt the connector to the usual flat cable?
If I read the Wikipedia article correctly [1], eDP is a superset of the DisplayPort standard, with added functionality to control the panel/backlight via the AUX channel and support for an on-panel framebuffer - so in theory one should be able to directly drive an eDP panel from a DisplayPort connector with a passive adapter and some way to supply power to the backlight.
One reason that Target Display Mode has faded away could be a real, tech hardware issue: retimers required to drive the High-DPI displays on recent Macs.
It's not a satisfying thread of speculation. And it's not even wrong: all 2020+ Macs support Thunderbolt, the whole point of which is to drive DisplayPort and PCIe over the wire...
How hard could it be, to get a Mac to just run as a ThunderBolt screen?
So the next thing I considered was Thunderbolt, DMA, PCIe, and security.
The new Mac hardware has tried very hard to protect the machine from data exfiltration. You can fall through the rabbit hole at the great Eclectic Light blog, but anyhow it can seem needlessly complex, and yet full hardware encryption while supporting system updates out in the world is challenging. I've been unable to brick my MacBook, so far, so that's an improvement.
I am dropping off my 27-inch iMac for recycling next week. It's not a retina model, and I did use it as a target display, but mounting hardware age (I replaced the motherboard etc myself) have rendered it to be too much work to deal with. It's 12 years old, that's almost good enough for me.
[·] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Component_video
To get that from your PI's HDMI you'd need something like
[·] https://www.amazon.com/Portta-3-5mm-Audio-Converter-support/...
and then something like this
[·] https://www.monoprice.com/product?p_id=562
Then you'd construct a custom Modeline like described in
[·] http://howto-pages.org/ModeLines/ &
[·] https://tldp.org/HOWTO/Framebuffer-HOWTO/
for I guess 1280x1024@60Hz? Maybe you don't even need to, because that is a common VESA resolution(SXGA) which should be provided anyways? So by setting this as fixed resolution by whichever means at startup, it could work. Maybe there are a even a few different ones to choose from, with slightly different timings, polarities. Or you could change that at the monitor itself. The second pdf from your link suggests that. I mean if the picture is rolling slowly up or down, or something like that.
I don't use PIs, so I don't know how the firmware works, which modes it supports, and how this all interacts with that videocore-thing, nowadays.
But that you'd need the converter gadgets and cable from there is obvious.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/144500108815?hash=item21a4e0ae0f:g:...
Check that out - RCA plugs, but as well a coax output, and another adapter to go coax > rabbit ears.
The only use case missing is getting RF out to an RCA connector.
...And of course the tripod.
So I’m giving up my sunk costs on getting this actual Apple ][e into working shape, but I’ve decided to settle for hollowing it out as a sort of classic computer arcade cabinet? (with the help of a apple-keyboard-connector-to-USB dongle I found online), putting in a rpi4, and perhaps running an emulator to start (since I’ll be specifically reharnessing the original keyboard). This means I’ll trash the main board (and perhaps disk drive enclosure, which I have no use for) and also need to find a flatscreen to very safely and carefully put into the A2M2010 monitor enclosure after removing the CRT component (lovely green phosphors, sad I won’t get to see more of it).
Anyways, all of this is to say that this device is lovely and I might get when if another piece of classic hardware falls into my possession. :)
You'll regret trashing it in a few years.
Spend a few hundred dollars and find someone to recap it and get it going for you again.
An old Apple 2 is a classic machine - it shouldn't be trashed. At worst sell it on to a collector for parts.
Electrolytic capacitors are unpleasant things. They require a liquid that slowly evaporates. They're temperature sensitive. Degraded ones behave erratically when they warm up, temporarily behaving and then not. And they can, worst of all, fail short. Quite possibly why your Apple's resurrection was temporary. I'd be more surprised if there wasn't a bang and magic smoke dissipating after turning on a PSU that had likely been off for 30+ years. Always replace or reform them in equipment of that vintage.
https://www.retrotink.com/product-page/5x-pro
Which can handle: Composite (shared with green RCA jack), S-Video, Component, RGB and Composite on SCART connector, inputs.
I have an RGB modded SNES connected with 21-pin to (modern HDMI) and it looks amazing.
If you have more exacting requirements or want a lot of configuration flexibility the OSSC may be a better choice but if you know exactly what your input/output is and it is supported, get the simple retrotink device.
1. can switch between 240p and 480i
2. Can switch between notch and 3D comb filter
Certain "not quite valid" outputs will not work with a 3D comb filter, but will work just fine with a notch filter.
The only downside is that sound from some devices (most notably the Sega Genesis, but possibly others) doesn't work over HDMI; as long as whatever you are putting your sound through has an analog input that's a non-issue though.
Probably some subtlety about voltages that I don't get about these ancient electronics.
Fortunately, most of the figuring out for perfect timings has already been done by other people. I was able to just input someone's numbers for my A1200. The results look positively digital, as if there was no analog step whatsoever in the chain.
There's a special sampling mode apparently.
Might have been some ideas stuck in my subconscious from the likes of Total Recall, but it seemed like we would be hitting a point where we stopped wanting to upgrade all of our devices every time we got a bigger TV with more resolution. We still see situations where we have monitors that we can't drive at full resolution and frequency from a single cable. So why not window in a 4k 60-120Hz feed and fill in the 'background' with a low frequency display (eg, a wallpaper and an information radiator), say 10k at 24Hz.
Right now I have a small collection of mostly period-accurate monitors for my retro boxes and I prefer them for nostalgic and aesthetic reasons, but I'm under no illusion these will last indefinitely and CRTs can be difficult and a bit dangerous to repair. Eventually I'll want something like the Medusa adapter.
I watched it just out of curiosity, and now I can at least claim to know another useless skill now.
Very low latency so perfect for gaming. Resolution is too low for anything else really.
Unfortunately it only has official windows drivers that work (I found open-source linux ones, but havent tried them yet).
It'd be really cool if a device like this tried to simulate the CRTs that would be connected (blur, diffusion, persistence, composite color artifacts, etc) to the vintage equipment. With that, it'd be perfect to restore old equipment where the irreplaceable CRT needs to be replaced.
There is no mention of recently released or upcoming alternatives that solve the same problem.
Much less expensive than the OSSC or Retrotink products.