Disney is already finding out that a streaming platform isn't cheap to run and hard to do efficiently.
522 karma · joined November 4, 2015
Disney is already finding out that a streaming platform isn't cheap to run and hard to do efficiently.
You can mix models in a single model file, it's a feature I've been experimenting with lately
Note: you don't have to rely on their model Library, you can use your own. Secondly, support for new models is through their bindings with llama.cpp
It's usually done to avoid the engineering cost of making the services more cloud native. What tends to happen a lot is that after a considerable portion of the migration is completed, the cost of the lift-and-shift effort start to overtake the savings, and the projected costs, dwarf the future savings.
I suspect this is what happened with Linkedin.
Also, shouldn't you be looking at the Italian dictionary. I think there is a very heavy cultural slant to this that you're ignoring that is informed by the inflexibility of non-english languages.
It's confusing, what am I really eating here?
How different is someone like me making a questioning a claim that the ECS scheduler clusters can't possibly reach 5000 nodes based on the fact the I wrote the original code (the example is obviously contrived and doesn't match neatly like for like).
This comment would be outside the expertise of readers and moderators at Linkedin. They'd be ill-equipped to intervene, I'd say.
I'd say this would be problematic and way too subjective for anyone not to be worried about said action.
It may have been episodal which happens to most people at some point in their.
I can understand the approach ( and not necessarily agree) if it were a chronic life long condition.
The identification is, as you say, dangerous. Most people have depressive episodes at least once in their lifetime, and it can leave just as suddenly as it comes.
It makes me wonder if this intense identification slows her recovery or even worse blinds her from seeing its cause; if in this case it has to do with how she is living her life in terms of family, work and social life.
I hope she gets better.
There was an arms race between them and the community to lead the story on new functionality. For example flannel came out first before docker acquihired SocketPlane for networking, while Calico was also in the works.
There was pressure from the community for a stable plugin API to allow for external contribution, but I imagine that it was ultimately against their best interest
It is a shame since I rooted hard for them in the early days.
You can't force people not to work, so you'll have some people who will choose to and some who won't, hence the people who do will have an obvious advantage.
That being said, progressing isn't everyone's life goal and I hope projects like this help create a market that 4-day weeks are the norm. The CTO at my last role was seriously considering this.
To expect an even response across all political parties across all governments by the metrics they gave around incitements to violence and danger to the public is a bit unrealistic.
Bias can easily be introduced in every phase of these cases being accessed. Arguably, long before the political and activist leanings are considered.
From that it's not to difficult to see it being extended to other groups.
EU leaders expressed concern over these policies because even they could see that this problematic intervention into the politics of a country is a line that need not be crossed. This extended ban isn't just FB, since other tech platform will likely fall in line.
It will be interesting to see if this will increase Trump's popularity when he does return to social platforms since his fanbase has been starved of his attention.
EDIT - since I'm being downvoted. The bias being referred to isn't strictly left/right leanings in America since FB is a global platform.
I was hopeful, but ultimately disappointed.
My home setup is now k3s.
Instead of speeding up, I speed down. I play the section of notes as chords (which is the fastest you can go). Then I gradually slow down by rotation of my hand as I'm discovering the fingering dynamics. I find this to be considerably faster for me. I find it hard to speed up and never do so enough when starting slow.
I'm by no means an expert but this has helped me
Unless there's something new on this case that I haven't seen?
Even then it's manageable if your production deployments are version pinned, it only becomes a problem if schemas in your database or messaging have had non compatible changes and data has been written (i.e you have binary and data dependencies in a release)
All this being said with the assumption that the CI/CD pipeline has been designed to best practices.
<code>
export MARKPATH=$HOME/.marks
function jump {
cd -P "$MARKPATH/$1" 2>/dev/null || echo "No such mark:
$1"}
function mark {
mkdir -p "$MARKPATH"; ln -s "$(pwd)" "$MARKPATH/$1"
}
function unmark {
rm -i "$MARKPATH/$1"
}
function marks {
ls -l "$MARKPATH" | sed 's/ / /g' | cut -d' ' -f9- | sed 's/ -/\t-/g' && echo }
</code>
To bookmark a directory:
$/home/user/Documents> mark
To jump to it
$/tmp> jump Documents
source: https://datascienceworkshops.com/blog/quickly-navigate-your-...
I can't find the orginal HN discussion on this but it has shown up a few times with incremental improvements like tab completions added.
Points 5 (maintainability),6 (testability) and 8 (test coverage) are added like they are trivial things to achieve.
Points 3 (composability),10 (single responsibility) - gloss over the fact that even if you do achieve this, deployment of services with detailed dependency graphs is still a big problem for complex environments. Deployments are a problem with microservices and it isn't clear how they address this.
I like the idea of the supercompiler at the end. It's a lofty ideal and don't think anything remotely near it will exist in a long time (or ever) where you compile to a cloud environment (unless it is purely immutable and versioned). Also consider that cloud services change. Can't imagine how a compiler will evolve with that, we have a hard enough time with changing ABIs.
Those in favour of the lab leak hypothesis point out that the virus showed up on the scene with all the evolutionary capability to spread amongst humans i.e with batteries included.
With previous Sars viruses my understanding is that each zoonotic jump was traceable with examples of previous forms in prior animal hosts to corroborate the lineage.
What makes Covid-19 interesting is that these zoonotic jumps or the gain of functions can be accelerated in the lab with the purpose of preparing us ahead of time for a dangerous forms of Sars style viruses. It looks like covid-19 may be that type of strain, not man made, but given the lab conditions for it to gain the capability. It may have escaped.
It's worth exploring the lab leak hypothesis but I would say that it's not politically expedient for any of the scientists or parties involved. We will never really know the truth and that is something we need to grow comfortable with.