Inventor of mRNA vaccines suspended from LinkedIn
twitter.com
twitter.com
I see this Wikipedia article does cite papers and patents of his a few times, but his name does not appear in the main body of the text: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RNA_vaccine
https://patents.google.com/patent/US5589466A/en
An excerpt from the 1996 patent by Robert Malone and others:
"The present invention relates to introduction of naked DNA and RNA sequences into a vertebrate to achieve controlled expression of a polypeptide. It is useful in gene therapy, vaccination, and any therapeutic situation in which a polypeptide should be administered to cells in vivo."
[EDIT - added summary from above patent for more reference] - SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION The present invention provides a method for delivering a pharmaceutical or immunogenic polypeptide to the interior of a cell of a vertebrate in vivo, comprising the step of introducing a preparation comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable injectable carrier and a naked polynucleotide operatively coding for the polypeptide into the interstitial space of a tissue comprising the cell, whereby the naked polynucleotide is taken up into the interior of the cell and has an immunogenic or pharmacological effect on the vertebrate.
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2021/06/investigative-reports/e...
My point : you still need somebody smart to set the tone, define the company line, write the basic copy. Then you farm trolls.
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RNA_vaccine&oldid...
This is how inverse totalitarianism "executes" people.. disables their access, shuts them out, and erases them from existence.
How different is someone like me making a questioning a claim that the ECS scheduler clusters can't possibly reach 5000 nodes based on the fact the I wrote the original code (the example is obviously contrived and doesn't match neatly like for like).
This comment would be outside the expertise of readers and moderators at Linkedin. They'd be ill-equipped to intervene, I'd say.
I'd say this would be problematic and way too subjective for anyone not to be worried about said action.