1,735 karma · joined June 29, 2013
A successful developer, for example, starting their consultancy/agency has a high chance of building a successful venture.
Tech hiring collusion, 2008 financial crisis, environment degradation and global warming, slavery-like conditions at suppliers of multinational corporations, medical bankruptcies in US and lack of guaranteed holidays, ghettos, plundering of natural resources, monopolies everywhere (as prescribed by Thiel btw).
Such a wonderful, mutually beneficial, ethical system with so many positive externalities! /s
You may claim that capitalism is the "best" system at this point, but to state that's wonderful is indeed indistinguishable from parody.
I object to the implicit assumption that "gaining" from sharing valuable content (corrected for conflicts of interests) is immoral or bad.
I would venture forth and suggest that community of developers should strive to increase financial and other "gains" of independent developers to counter centralization of megacorporates.
On the other hand, non-medicine (alternative medicine) and non-science (pseudoscience) have been spectacularly right more than once. That's the point. Agree with empathy angle and need for emotional arguments, though.
How come? No, in all seriousness, mission is secondary to growth for startups, isn't it? If you are passionate about the mission, shouldn't you join a non-profit?
Yes, for me it does. A large amount of symbols on screen makes my mind drift away and it gets harder to concentrate on the flow and meaning of code. Semicolons or lisp parens are good examples of such visual noise. While productivity decrease is not drastic, it's noticeable. The mind adjusts and this problem diminishes with time and practice of the particular syntax but it's still present.
In absolute agreement. UBI may unlock extreme growth of efficiency by enabling risk taking without risk of total defeat.
Citation needed. Extremely needed.
Counter-anecdote: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonas_Salk
edit: wording
Atom is my primary editor and I am extremely satisfied with it. Your self-righteous arrogant attitude is strange and has nothing to do with objective, rational criticism.
If that is true your comment is utterly useless to anyone reading it.
Django is adding websockets support using the $150K grant from Mozilla. Rails is adding websockets support in the next version with ActionCable. Phoenix and Play frameworks have great support for websockets. Websockets are an integral part of node ecosystem.
Your websockets "challenge" is not based on facts.
Because most apps are being built in the conditions of uncertainty and the development team doesn't know if the edge case will become a business requirement.
>Feature bloat/mission creep sucks.
Unqualified, this statement is nothing more than a thought terminating cliche. Whatever constitutes "bloat" depends on the context and preferences of a decision maker.
The point was that if a new framework aims to capture enough attention and traction to be a sustainable alternative to the incumbents it has to support websocket .
Come on, it's an anonymous troll account with an obvious goal of ridiculing pro-PC argument. Check your #{x}!