I would not assume that he won't try to run again, nor would I assume that his party would not support it if he did. Though I do agree with the rest of what you wrote.
4,631 karma · joined April 30, 2012
I would not assume that he won't try to run again, nor would I assume that his party would not support it if he did. Though I do agree with the rest of what you wrote.
Even Trump isn't that dumb. There's a reason he dialed the tariffs back so much; price hikes lose elections.
If there's one highly visible product of whose price all Americans are keenly aware, it's gasoline. And on top of that, it affects the price of pretty much everything else too.
I thought the tariffs would be his undoing but jacking up the price of gas is even worse for him.
Copy and edit do, but move (aka rename) generally does not, and that is the part that is problematic.
I don't think the described sequence of operations is all that unusual. Not the most common case for sure, but hardly unlikely in the grand scheme of things.
American voters witnessed this demagogue incite a riot in an attempt to steal an election, and after that 2/3 of them still couldn't be bothered to vote against him.
As an American myself, blaming Americans for this situation seems pretty fair.
My point was that local and state governments do need your tax dollars, in the sense that that is literally their income. But for the federal government it's different. If federal tax revenue declines, they can just sell more treasury notes and continue to spend as much as before. In that sense, federal tax revenue has no direct effect on federal spending.
So yeah, when the price of oil goes up, oil companies make more money, and prices go up for pretty much everyone.
Which makes sense--I don't doubt that he is a subject matter expert where this patent is concerned. If this algorithm continues to be widely used or its use increases, then that would be likely be good for him.
bunzip2 / bzcat / bzip2
gunzip / uncompress
unzip / zipinfo
pigz / unpigz
pkg-config / x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config
perlbug / perlthanks
Use ls -li to show the inode number for each file or directory. For example:
$ ls -li /usr/bin/{bzip2,bunzip2,bzcat}
23069197 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 39144 Sep 5 2019 /usr/bin/bunzip2
23069197 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 39144 Sep 5 2019 /usr/bin/bzcat
23069197 -rwxr-xr-x 3 root root 39144 Sep 5 2019 /usr/bin/bzip2Isn't that exactly what a credit card balance transfer is?
After all, most people will be on their best behavior during an interview, and even a lengthy interview process is a very short period of time compared to working with someone for weeks or months.
OTOH, if you don't need to be persuaded and just want information on how best to go about doing it, then I think it makes little difference where the information comes from as long as it's of reasonable quality.
If it's not even useful after such a short time, then I question whether it was really fit for the intended purpose even when it was new.
Five years from now, I have no doubt that the processor will still be fine for most uses, but I doubt that 8GB will be. Especially given that some of the most common memory hogs aren't under Apple's control (cough Chrome cough).
// call foo() one day from now:
sleep(86400); foo();I mean, FFS--we have a nominally Republican candidate who campaigned on raising taxes and was elected anyway!
You'd have to be pretty gullible to think that raising taxes on imported goods won't result in price hikes at the checkout counter.
When LLMs can assist with writing useful tests before having seen any implementation, then I’ll be properly impressed.
Without mmap, every process ends up caching its own private copy of that data in memory (think fopen, fread, etc). With mmap, every process accesses the same cached copy of that data directly from the FS cache.
Granted this is a rather specific use case, but for this case it makes a huge difference.
using (var resource1 = acquire() {
using (var resource2 = acquire()) {
using (var resource3 = acquire()) {
// use resources here..
}
}
}
Compared to: var resource1 = acquire();
defer { release(resource1); }
var resource2 = acquire();
defer { release(resource2); }
var resource3 = acquire();
defer { release(resource3); }
// use resources here
Of course if you want the extra scopes (for whatever reason), you can still do that with defer, you're just not forced to.There were multiple times I wanted to contribute to SO but couldn't because I didn't have sufficient "reputation", or something. I shrugged and moved on.
That was entirely accidental. There's absolutely no guarantee that any given monopoly will produce anything remotely like Bell Labs, and I don't believe that a monopoly was required to do what Bell Labs did.