348 karma · joined September 19, 2016
Usually other systematic errors are the problem though.
- Fusion reactors are an order of magnitude physically larger than fission reactors,
- The particle energies are an order of magnitude higher than fission, resulting in much nastier activation
and that results in orders of magnitude more highly radioactive waste.
The problem with this paper is not the result, but the authors' tone punching through, which expresses surprise at this result. This paper should have been rejected for revision on that basis.
I'm not sure when this became a thing, but it's very real to me. It's a snowball effect; these folks get better and better at buying everything up, and then get all the capital to continue and expand the process. I have stock notifications everywhere and everything is gone as soon as it is posted.
Regarding the article - it is definitely not all about fancy fabs that can't be built - these are analog and power parts! And microcontroller fabs are fancier, but usually many many nodes behind state of the art. Maybe it is a capital thing, but every fab I've ever encountered is more than busy. Sure, you lose money trying to do the hardest thing and failing, but the problem is so widespread across so many non-edge products that it must be explained by other factors.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.03534
So that's new.
There also seems to be an emphasis on correctness in the code, which sounds great to anyone who ever tried doing real work in FreeCad, though of course the gap in functionality is vast.
Diamond magnetometers might not be a great fit for this application. They require a powerful laser, RF, and are presently huge and impractical. Also, they are just terrible at accuracy and drift like crazy. Finally - and this is the thing I really can't get - they require a giant magnetic field to operate. If your magnetometer has a giant magnet bolted to it, you would expect it to basically measure drift in that magnet. Diamond magnetometer people will jump out of the woodwork now, but I haven't seen published high quality data that says otherwise. Would love to be proved wrong.
Diamond magnetometers are great at being a magnetic microscope since they have really high density of measurement sites and you can stick it right up next to an object of interest.
The papers describe a new magnetic field sensor that can measure Brain signals. What's new is that you can do it without a million dollar shielded room. It's just powered by USB-C on a MacBook.
Alas, they encrypted the file starting two years ago.