Right...
566 karma · joined July 6, 2019
Right...
Errr...this ain't watercooling man.
> One of the advantages of serverless models is supposed to be that obscure, infrequently used programs can be utilized more cheaply,
No-one: Literally no-one: Infoq: thinks serverless is all about obscure programs.
> Vendor Lock
Well try migrating a massive Java codebase to .NET or a deep Oracle application to Postrges. That's life.
> Functions that have not been run on a particular platform before, or have not been run in while, take some time to initialize.
Boo-hoo mah warm up time. Get over it already.
> you (generally) can't run entire applications on severless systems.
You aren't supposed to - serverless is for developing systems based around microservices, claiming they are intended to replace servers for running COTS products is a disgusting strawman.
> Despite all these complaints, I'm not against serverless solutions per se. I promise.
Promise away. I promise not to care.
MC Hammer begs to differ XD
This is exaggeration, they are not badly in conflict with each other, we just have not found a way to unify them, i.e. explain gravity through QM.
Yes, the insulin response of the second is orders of magnitude greater. It's poison.