You can't image where the connection to company towns could come from in an article about people renting from their employers?
250 karma · joined December 14, 2022
You can't image where the connection to company towns could come from in an article about people renting from their employers?
How does any large company build into a new/growing market without having a "huge advantage"? Do they have to wait until the market is matured from smaller companies before they can get into that market?
Always important to reflect on whether stances like "SF is degenerating" are based on a rational analysis of what is actually happening, versus a more emotional response to stories that might be more like the topic of this post, just with less visibility into the exact circumstances of what happened.
Not saying that's likely happening here, but the clear response to the original news was that this was the perfect example of what SF is becoming. How often does that assumption happen?
While this doesn't specifically say to only eat 500 calories, this is an explicit recommendation for eating only potatoes as a diet in an article proclaiming that eating 500 calories a day of only potatoes was an effective way to lose weight.
But at the end of day, I just don't see value in "I did some diet thing for 2 weeks!". Just like someone writing an article about trying out a new programming language for a couple weeks and labeling it amazing or terrible wouldn't be super interesting to me either.
For two weeks. Which is effectively nothing when you are talking about long-term issues like nutrition, health, weight, etc.
Or the comment on "So the fact that we ate exclusively one type of food most likely contributed to weight loss, but it's unlikely to be the whole story."
When I think of a child who has been "beaten", I imagine repeated bludgeoning across the body, often with a tool, and usually with visible bruising and possible laceration and bleeding.
"Spanking" can definitely include implements, though that's less common nowadays as people have started to view the act in a less positive light overall.
And the "without psychological trauma" is one aspect where it isn't really that clear if there is a level of spanking that avoids that whole issue.
Yes, striking your child to teach them a lesson is definitely completely unrelated to striking your child out of anger/frustration. Definitely no connections there at all.
Some like you said, are basically an reservation to for accomodations for a specific time period every year at a specific place.
But there are others that are basically "You have 4 nights a year at accommodation options X, Y, X". So you aren't guaranteed any specific locations or days ahead of time.
It gets even worse when you are in a line of work where the estimates are part of some kind of sales pipeline. Then you aren't just estimating based on effort required, but also against a likely number that the customer will ever agree to.
So, to me, even paying $60-$80 for various streaming services that are all on-demand (which wasn't the case for the cable I used to have) is still an amazing deal.
Oh, and I don't have to sit through ads every 5 minutes.
Personally this isn't really a negative. I've found that I only care about "agents" when the scale of the game focuses on caring about individual units. Once you get beyond that, I don't think the simulation necessarily is more interesting just because it uses unique agents. And conversely, I've never thought while playing SC4 or similar game that "This game would be better if it simulated all citizens as unique units".
Almost as though this isn't as simple a topic as "stick and stones" and that everyone has different tolerances for what they'll put up with depending on the setting and context.
The market of RPGs specifically made in the west by 1995 is relatively limited. So, you cross out the biggest entries in that space and you will run out of options pretty quickly.
But the argument falls a little too close to "If you exclude the western RPGs titles with a plot, there aren't many western RPGs with a plot".
It can potentially apply to any project with a fixed budget, whether that's internal or external. And time is money, sometimes quite literally if you are working in the agency world. Customers will choose a project with a $50k budget versus a $80k budget even if smaller budget will be significantly worse, as long as it meets one of their basic needs (or even if it doesn't, if that's all the budget they have to work with).
It's been years since I've used Resharper and maybe things have changed, but if you are looking to improve battery life, it's one of the last things I would start using.
If your goal is to come with any reason to label a question a "list question", then I don't think it would be too hard to find a way to label any potential question as a "list question" and have it closed.
A different interpretation would be that the question is about whether there are maintainability issues with a certain implementation of CSS. Which the question being potentially answered with a "Yes/No" where an obviously better answer might provide an example or two of issues that could arise.
I'll be honest, I mainly knew what the answer to your question would be, but I tried to put myself in the shoes of a newer user trying to understand what questions a person should ask on SO and was curious of maybe things were different.
And the answer appears to still be some form "you won't know until it's closed".
The issue is that by discouraging participation in the community, you end up with a repository of old questions with decent answers (that may or may not be 'decent' anymore) and fewer newer questions with even worse answers.
My experience is that using SO is basically trying to find a middle ground between an answer that is too old to be relevant, but not so new that the effect of the stagnation of the community hasn't made the answer less than helpful.
People bickering over answers on decade old questions sounds exactly like the sort of community SO is trying to foster.
Remove the "they're evil" part and I don't see what's reductionist about it being about "having more control over employees"?
That to me sounds like a very likely explanation.
How many times in history has a vehicle recall meant the cars were returned and destroyed?
What makes this situation any more confusing than all the previous times vehicles were recalled?
I don't think "Use words that put a more positive spin for Tesla PR" is something regulators should be working faster on.