268 karma · joined October 2, 2011
(no idea if that works, always wrestled above my weight)
When you're working with NASA, and they officially help you with the encryption, you're not "seizing" anything. This is a very cool and interesting story without the L33T HAXX0R DUD3Z angle being weirdly inserted into it...the McMoon team are heroes many times over and awesome in their own right.
If you "pull the busses" do the engines still have the ability to send their telemetry data?
http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/professional/products/professi...
Also, I agree with the "April Fools" question but I'm afraid the answer is "no, it's just TechCrunch."
I think the core problem with the presumptive "conclusion" is that it leaves out the whole issue of one of the biggest parts of "miscellaneous" or "entertainment" expense. Many Americans spend over $100/month on media consumption, most of it cable bills. That's pretty much sending money to the government...not the fake elected one but the one that's really in charge, multinational corporations with absolute power and no term limits (which shape pretty much all of our policy on everything, including health care and education).
So are Americans really spending all that wisely? After all, these are the organizations directly responsible for the rising costs and dwindling quality of both those services.
Second question, what gives with defining "toys" to so consistently mean "branded icons from franchised fiction?"
This is precisely what I kind of hate about yuppie culture. You can't have a model railroad, you have to have Thomas The Tank Engine. You can't play with your mom's broomstick and be a wizard, you need a Nimbus 2000 (no, wait, make that a 3000). It goes on and on, and even toys that used to have malleable generic purposes by design, like LEGO, need to be branded and defined and limited and explained and attached to some existing, trademarked, copyrighted, closed universe of predefined meaning.
There's nothing wrong with having a bit of this, sure. I have nothing against a couple Transformers or GIJOEs or Barbies or whatever. But if anything those kinds of toys should be "a sometimes food" for the imagination, and certainly not an all consuming obsession.
What kids need most of the time are real toys, the opposite of these sorts of things. Some blank pages to color on, some simple building blocks, a train that doesn't necessarily "go" anywhere...a racetrack whose races haven't already been run.
If there's a nostalgia to be had for something "lost" in youth, that's where it lies for me...not about anything I've lost, but rather what today's kids are having stolen from them before they even have a chance to miss it.