You aren't gonna to need it[1]
Do the simplest thing that can possibly work[2]
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_aren%27t_gonna_need_it 2. https://www.ronjeffries.com/xprog/articles/practices/pracsim...
316 karma · joined June 12, 2009
You aren't gonna to need it[1]
Do the simplest thing that can possibly work[2]
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_aren%27t_gonna_need_it 2. https://www.ronjeffries.com/xprog/articles/practices/pracsim...
The most interesting part of this article to me was the end, where the author argues about how important High School Debate is and how Kritiks are the ruin of this important tradition. I was a HS debator in the early 90s, before K's were popular, and from my experience debate was already a fun but ultimately harmful activity. The whole idea was to spew a constant stream of arguments that didn't have any merit as quickly as possible, hoping the opposing team would forget to respond to just one out of 100, and then you win.
HS Debate already trained a generation of win-at-all-costs, who cares if you are right folks like Karl Rove. I don't see how the current generation of kritik based debate could possibly be any worse
GitHub is taking my code and ignoring the license. I don’t understand why anyone would think that is ok.
https://www.theguardian.com/football/2018/jun/25/swiss-xhaka...
Even then, the potential punishment was a 2-match ban. They wouldn't have stripped Switzerland of the victory,banned them for a year, and taken away all the money they earned throughout the entire season (all things that Blizzard did)
"Uber Losses Not explained by Uber China and No One Can Explain How Profitability Can Be Achieved"
The losses covered in that article don't include anything from China.
[1] https://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2016/11/can-uber-ever-delive...
That's not true, they are buying a 3ds so they can play Pokemon. Without Pokemon every kid I know would rather have an iphone/ipad than a 3ds. (I'm talking about Pokemon Omega Ruby style games, not Pokemon Go).
If a city/country wants to base its rental units on a day-by-day, airbnb model, then fine. The problem is when airbnb comes into a regular market and "disrupts" that market by not paying hotel taxes or following local subletting laws.
I say that as someone who very recently used airbnb for a great deal in NYC, and was admonished by the host not to talk about our situation in the lobby, the elevators, or anywhere else someone might overhear.
Is there any reason to think that Jacob Applebaum is actually a rapist? I would really like to see some proof of that, before jumping to any conclusions.
It sounds more likely that some photo based speed trap has been compromised.
# I want to escape the { in the next line
then it would cause your code to fail because of unbalanced { characters.When I search for 'ruby json' I get http://ruby-doc.org//stdlib-2.0/libdoc/json/rdoc/JSON.html, which is part of the standard library.
When I search for 'java json' I get several libraries, all of which are actively supported: www.json.org/json, gson, and Jackson.
I don't really understand your comment about significant implementation issues that aren't issues at all with Tcl. Could you give an example? What edge cases aren't covered by the standard Perl and Ruby JSON libraries?
I really wish someone would take charge of wiki.tcl.tk and cut out all the nonsense. For example, I am currently in need of producing some JSON from one of our Tcl apps. So I search for JSON and I get this:
It starts out pretty promising -- listing a bunch of competing JSON implementations for tcl -- which is unusual for a wiki.tcl.tk page. But then it quickly devolves into the usual stream of consciousness that infects every tcl wiki page. What am I supposed to actually do?
At first we have a big list of different implementations; that makes sense, every language is kinda like that.
But before the first page is even finished, we get weird "string is double gotcha" stuff from gchung, including "you should use the following" 100 character regex! How about: you should use this module for doing this usual thing that every language in the world can do?
Then, we get JMN's thoughts about how a JSON generator is better than a JSON parser. Apparently TCV solved this himself in 2009 (but, no code referenced). Very quickly we get into "here's my version!".
I'm not complaining about all these guys contributing different solutions. But can't the community gather around one of them? It's like searching wikipedia but always landing on the "talk" page.
Hey tclers, try this on for size. Google for "perl json" and see if you get a real response that explains how to do it, or a bunch of random guys talking about how they solved it themselves. Then try "ruby json", "java json", "python json".
That is why tcl is dead.
[:foo, :bar].each do |attribute|
attr_reader attribute
end
You probably wouldn't want do actually do that with attr_reader, but it is just an example.Privacy is important, but let's be honest, you basically can't hide from the NSA.
Did Sarah model the data poorly ("We stored each show as a document in MongoDB containing all of its nested information, including cast members").
Or is there an easy way to extract that information that Sarah just doesn't know about yet?
Keep in mind the constraints in the article, for example: some shows have 20,000+ episodes, actors show up in 100s of shows, and "We had no way to tell, aside from comparing the names, whether they were the same person".
The last part seems like a really straightforward relational critique to me. If you don't break the actors out into unique entities then you can't compare them across shows. But if you do break them out into unique entities, then how to you present the show information without doing joins?
My read was that even when you think you don't have "graph like relationships" in your data, you actually do.
The original author did say this, but I would like to add: if you don't have "graph like relationships", then your data is pretty trivial and any data store will do.
As an example, the new flat google maps app is a disaster. It took me weeks to figure out how to do fairly simple things, like how to cancel turn by turn directions. My wife is totally lost, as a long time iphone 4 user trying to use the flat iphone 5 version. When she tries to navigate while I am driving, she is constantly confused while I say, "no! just swipe down hard enough that the app thinks you are going back, then click on the box, then click the x, then swipe up, and stand on your left foot!"
But we have to have a map, so we use it.
As a startup, this is what you should think about: Is your app as useful as google maps? If not, then you can't afford to make it unusable with a trendy flat interface.